# Latticra Current Status Status: public status record Last updated: 2026-05-29 CDT Edge edition checkpoint: `v0.3.0edge` Documentation hub: [../README.md](../README.md) Latest Latticra effect status surface note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra effect substrate transition intake note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra effect contract schema note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra effect allowlist/build-profile boundary note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra effect runner implementation review boundary note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra separate-build platform integration review boundary note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra Model-1 bridge protocol contract note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra Model-1 import and mixed-build review boundary note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra computational proof foundation note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra computational math and physics evaluation note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra Speculum premise note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra proof object 1 emergent particle mass note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra proof object 2 Higgs counterplay note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra proof object 3 Higgs causal closure no-go note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra proof object 4 identity-replay impedance note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay impedance candidate particle table note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay impedance L0 mass-ratio runner note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay impedance L1 constrained substrate search note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay impedance L2 pre-registered holdout note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay impedance L3 holdout intake note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay impedance L4 execution gate note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay impedance L5 evidence review note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-1 dynamic substrate runner note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-1 bounded range falsifier note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-2 hierarchical substrate pre-registration note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-2 prediction runner note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-2 prediction failure analysis note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-3 worthiness gate note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-3 topological amplification pre-registration note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-3 prediction runner note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-3 rejection analysis note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-3 failure visual suite note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra identity-replay Model-3 refined pre-registration note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest Latticra Higgs challenge one-page verifier note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest current estimate refresh note: 2026-05-24 CDT Latest current estimate table source alignment note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest current estimate mathematical rebase note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest completion estimate review README/status alignment note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest completion estimate review after runtime-boundary abuse-case fixtures note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest defensive threat model validation refinement note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest high-assurance security baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest memory-safety roadmap note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest supply-chain security baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest zero-trust runtime authority baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest cyber incident reporting and response baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest vulnerability management release gate baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest cryptographic assurance and key management baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest identity, credential, and access management baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest security logging, monitoring, and detection baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest backup, recovery, and cyber resilience baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest secure configuration and change management baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest network exposure and remote access baseline note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest data classification and protection baseline note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest AI and agentic automation security baseline note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest platform boot and firmware integrity baseline note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest security validation and assessment baseline note: 2026-05-28 CDT Current v0.3.0edge effect-status summary: ```text latticra_effect_status_surface_present=1 edge_checkpoint=v0.3.0edge cli_effect_performed=0 local_operator_effects_present=1 user_local_install_effect_present=1 user_local_copy_effect_present=1 receipt_write_effect_present=1 operator_bundle_write_effect_present=1 host_mutation_allowed=0 root_authority_allowed=0 network_allowed=0 usb_write_allowed=0 qemu_run_allowed=0 production_readiness_claim=0 ``` Latest runtime boundary policy expansion after threat-model note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest runtime boundary abuse-case fixture expansion note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest runtime boundary Lat pipeline comment evidence note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat parse-failure comment evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline failure span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline parse-error evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline semantic-error evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline downstream stage-error evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline stage-summary evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline module/count evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline first-declaration evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline first-clause evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat LIR edge-kind evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR no-effect evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR module-summary evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR module label evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR source-span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR node-kind evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-node evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-node topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-node span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-node evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-node topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-node span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge endpoint evidence propagation note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge endpoint payload evidence propagation note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge endpoint topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint payload evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest kernel lifecycle evidence status note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest macOS integration transferability map note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest macOS codesigning and notarization plan note: 2026-05-29 CDT Latest macOS reset/uninstall live-target classifier note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest macOS reset/uninstall dry-run planner note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest macOS reset/uninstall absence-report contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest macOS reset/uninstall closeout audit chain status note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Seal README status row alignment note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal capability metadata report surface status note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal product spine note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal product spine status note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal operator receipt report contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal operator receipt report implementation plan note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal operator receipt report implementation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal operator receipt report surface/status note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal operator receipt report predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal local capability registry schema contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal local capability registry schema implementation plan note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal local capability registry schema implementation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal local capability registry schema surface/status note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal Panel dashboard planning checkpoint note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal Panel dashboard view-model contract note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation plan note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Seal Panel dashboard view-model surface/status note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Seal signed receipt proof path contract note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Seal signed receipt proof path implementation note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Seal signed receipt proof path surface/status note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Seal policy decision status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal policy decision predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal signed request status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signed request predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal request freshness status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal request freshness predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal parameter schema status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal parameter schema predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal agentic automation security predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal agentic automation security public-entrypoint note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal status rollup predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal status rollup status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal runtime handoff status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal runtime handoff predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal runtime handoff report status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal effect decision status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal capability gate predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal capability gate status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal verification receipt status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal crypto verify backend status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal Ed25519 verify status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal crypto graduation gate status note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal verified receipt promotion status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal verified capability gate status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal verified effect decision status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal runtime handoff evaluation status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia offline AI Stage-0 foundation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia local context engine Stage-1 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia runtime profile Stage-2 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia developer workbench Stage-3 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia systems engineering mode Stage-4 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia productivity loop Stage-5 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia protective safety boundary Stage-6 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia guarded tool authority Stage-7 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation contract Stage-8 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia local model registry contract Stage-9 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia inference readiness contract Stage-10 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia runtime invocation contract Stage-11 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia model load contract Stage-12 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt receipt contract Stage-13 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt materialization contract Stage-14 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia awareness dialogue contract Stage-15 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation handoff contract Stage-16 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenization boundary contract Stage-17 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenizer specification contract Stage-18 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenizer manifest contract Stage-19 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenizer artifact inventory contract Stage-20 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenizer artifact measurement contract Stage-21 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenizer artifact verification contract Stage-22 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenizer artifact binding contract Stage-23 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia tokenizer runtime attachment contract Stage-24 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt tokenization contract Stage-25 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt token sequence contract Stage-26 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia context window assembly contract Stage-27 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation input contract Stage-28 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation runtime handoff contract Stage-29 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation invocation contract Stage-30 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result contract Stage-31 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result review contract Stage-32 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result disposition contract Stage-33 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release contract Stage-34 note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt contract Stage-35 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review contract Stage-36 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition contract Stage-37 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-38 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review contract Stage-40 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition contract Stage-41 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-42 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt contract Stage-43 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review contract Stage-44 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition contract Stage-45 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-46 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt contract Stage-47 note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review contract Stage-48 note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition contract Stage-49 note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-50 note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt contract Stage-51 note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Latticra Console profile preset note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Latticra Console standalone console install note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console standalone installer preset note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console standalone local install preset note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console standalone contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console host-embedding contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Latticra Console read-only host inventory contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Latticra Console host-adapter contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console Seal receipt-request contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console receipt payload schema note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console receipt payload artifact draft note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console receipt payload artifact review gate note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console receipt payload artifact review receipt contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console receipt payload artifact review receipt draft contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console receipt payload materialization plan note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console signature-request binding contract note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Latticra Console receipt contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Latticra Console OS-base planning contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Latticra Console VM evidence contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal verification receipt predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal verification policy predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal verification policy status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal crypto verify backend status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal Ed25519 verify status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal crypto graduation gate status note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal verified receipt promotion status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal verified capability gate status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal verified effect decision status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal runtime handoff evaluation status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal runtime handoff report status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal key parsing predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal key parsing status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal bounded key parsing implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal future key parsing implementation plan note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal future key parsing implementation contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal public-key parsing predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal public-key parsing status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal public-key parsing implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal public-key parsing contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal key-material predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Seal key-material status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal key-material implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal key-material contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal key-handling predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Seal key-handling status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal key-handling implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal key-handling contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signing operation predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Seal signing operation status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signing operation implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signing operation contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signer invocation predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Seal signer invocation status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signer invocation implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signer invocation contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signer handoff predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Seal signer handoff status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signer handoff implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signer handoff contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signing authorization predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Seal signing authorization status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signing authorization implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signing authorization contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signature request predecessor status alignment note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signature request status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signature request implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal signature request contract note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal report envelope status/public-entry note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Seal report envelope implementation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat grammar report metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat grammar line-comment metadata refinement note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat grammar unsupported block-comment rejection refinement note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline comment metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline diagnostic comment metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat parse-failure comment evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline failure span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline parse-error evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline semantic-error evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline downstream stage-error evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline stage-summary evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline module/count evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline first-declaration evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline first-clause evidence propagation note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat LIR edge-kind evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR no-effect evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR module-summary evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR module label evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR source-span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR node-kind evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-node evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-node topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-node span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-node evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-node topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-node span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge endpoint evidence propagation note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge endpoint payload evidence propagation note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge endpoint topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-28 CDT Latest Lat LIR first-edge span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint payload evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint topology evidence propagation note: 2026-05-27 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat LIR first transition-source edge span evidence propagation note: 2026-05-26 CDT Latest Lat model normalization note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat model report declaration metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat model report clause metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline model normalization integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat-to-LIR model lowering integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat-to-LIR declaration metadata refinement note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat-to-LIR diagnostic refinement note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat-to-LIR diagnostic declaration metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline lowering diagnostic integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat-to-LIR clause metadata refinement note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat-to-LIR diagnostic clause metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline diagnostic declaration metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline diagnostic clause metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline report declaration metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat pipeline report clause metadata integration note: 2026-05-25 CDT Latest Lat-to-LIR lowering note: 2026-05-18 18:15 CDT Latest Lat pipeline note: 2026-05-18 19:40 CDT Latest Lat pipeline report refinement note: 2026-05-18 23:30 CDT Latest Lat pipeline diagnostic integration note: 2026-05-19 14:20 CDT Latest Lat pipeline diagnostic main test audit note: 2026-05-19 17:15 CDT Latest Lat semantic diagnostics refinement note: 2026-05-19 00:35 CDT Latest LIR report refinement note: 2026-05-19 00:55 CDT Latest Lat-specific LIR refinement note: 2026-05-18 21:30 CDT Latest language representation review note: 2026-05-19 21:05 CDT Latest L-UI rendering detailed report refinement note: 2026-05-19 20:25 CDT Latest L-UI rendering README/status alignment note: 2026-05-19 20:35 CDT Latest L-UI completion estimate review note: 2026-05-19 20:45 CDT Latest C++ authority expansion contract review note: 2026-05-19 20:55 CDT Latest Nucleus task no-effect report alignment note: 2026-05-19 21:15 CDT Latest Nucleus task README/status alignment note: 2026-05-19 21:25 CDT Latest Nucleus task report-only execution refinement note: 2026-05-19 21:35 CDT Latest Nucleus task report-only execution README/status alignment note: 2026-05-20 01:45 CDT Latest project notes Nucleus report-only alignment note: 2026-05-20 02:20 CDT Latest project notes Nucleus report-only status/index check note: 2026-05-20 02:45 CDT Latest Nucleus report-only announcement review note: 2026-05-20 03:00 CDT Latest Nucleus report-only announcement README alignment note: 2026-05-20 03:20 CDT Latest project notes Nucleus announcement README status/index check note: 2026-05-20 03:50 CDT Latest runtime boundary refinement plan note: 2026-05-18 22:15 CDT Latest runtime boundary refinement implementation note: 2026-05-18 22:45 CDT Latest runtime boundary report refinement note: 2026-05-18 23:10 CDT Latest runtime boundary policy matrix refinement note: 2026-05-18 23:55 CDT Latest runtime boundary domain matrix refinement note: 2026-05-19 14:10 CDT Latest runtime boundary domain matrix report integration note: 2026-05-19 16:20 CDT Latest project notes alignment note: 2026-05-19 18:25 CDT Latest status and announcement consistency review note: 2026-05-19 18:35 CDT Latest completion percentage review note: 2026-05-19 18:45 CDT Latest strategy estimate review note: 2026-05-19 18:45 CDT Latest authority implementation review note: 2026-05-19 18:55 CDT Latest authority status/docs alignment note: 2026-05-19 19:00 CDT Latest current status detail rollup note: 2026-05-19 19:05 CDT Latest authority foundation index alignment note: 2026-05-19 19:15 CDT Latest status announcement review note: 2026-05-19 19:25 CDT Latest status announcement review index alignment note: 2026-05-19 19:35 CDT Latest public entry-point consistency scan note: 2026-05-19 19:45 CDT Latest project notes follow-up alignment note: 2026-05-19 19:55 CDT Latest project notes follow-up status/index check note: 2026-05-19 20:05 CDT Latest authority announcement review note: 2026-05-19 20:15 CDT Latest Nucleus task report refinement note: 2026-05-19 00:15 CDT Scope: current progress, completion estimates, merged capability areas, and next priorities. ## Project status Latticra is an early-stage, contract-first systems architecture and language project. The repository currently emphasizes: - public project identity; - strategy and status documentation; - security-policy documentation; - constrained C/C++ foundation direction; - governed C++ authority-layer planning; - Constrained C++ authority layer contract; - Constrained C++ authority layer implementation plan; - initial no-effect constrained C++ authority-layer implementation; - C++ authority expansion contract review; - authority implementation review; - authority status/docs alignment; - authority announcement review; - current status detail rollup; - authority foundation index alignment; - status announcement review; - public entry-point consistency scan; - project notes follow-up alignment; - project notes follow-up status/index check; - project notes Nucleus report-only alignment; - project notes Nucleus report-only status/index check; - Nucleus report-only announcement review; - Nucleus report-only announcement README alignment; - project notes Nucleus announcement README status/index check; - language representation review; - Nadia offline AI Stage-0 foundation for Panel installability, Console interoperability, and awareness principles; - Latticra Console profile presets, standalone dry-run/local installer presets, and standalone contract for hosted reference, standalone, Panel embedded, host-embedded planning, and OS-base planning under no-effect authority; - Latticra Console host-embedding contract for pre-integration host adapter gates, read-only inventory prerequisites, and explicit denial of host process/file authority; - Latticra Console read-only host inventory contract for future host evidence scope while current LC performs no inventory, host probing, file reads, process launches, or mutation; - Latticra Console receipt contract for profile, host-contract, host-inventory, and Runtime Boundary evidence while current LC performs no signing or receipt writes; - Nadia local context engine Stage-1 for no-network context-pack generation; - Nadia runtime profile Stage-2 for offline model-readiness metadata before inference; - Nadia developer workbench Stage-3 for prompt-plan generation without prompt evaluation; - Nadia systems engineering mode Stage-4 for prompt-plan mode validation before prompt evaluation; - Nadia productivity loop Stage-5 for operator-reviewed local productivity ledger entries before training or tool authority; - Nadia protective safety boundary Stage-6 for non-sexual-use, anti-manipulation, and namesake-cause awareness restrictions; - Nadia guarded tool authority Stage-7 for report-only tool preflight without tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation contract Stage-8 before prompt materialization, prompt evaluation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia local model registry contract Stage-9 before model selection, model installation, prompt evaluation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia inference readiness contract Stage-10 before runtime invocation, model loading, prompt evaluation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia runtime invocation contract Stage-11 before runtime process spawning, model session creation, model loading, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia model load contract Stage-12 before model file opening, weight mapping, weight loading, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt receipt contract Stage-13 before prompt source opening, prompt text receipt, prompt materialization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt materialization contract Stage-14 before prompt buffer allocation, prompt text materialization, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia awareness dialogue contract Stage-15 for future official Nadia Initiative Q&A scope before dialogue generation, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation handoff contract Stage-16 before prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenization boundary contract Stage-17 before tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenizer specification contract Stage-18 before tokenizer manifest loading, tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenizer manifest contract Stage-19 before tokenizer manifest loading, tokenizer manifest parsing, tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenizer artifact inventory contract Stage-20 before tokenizer artifact path resolution, artifact scanning, artifact hashing, tokenizer manifest loading, tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenizer artifact measurement contract Stage-21 before tokenizer artifact opening, artifact reading, artifact hashing, artifact digest recording, artifact size recording, tokenizer manifest loading, tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenizer artifact verification contract Stage-22 before tokenizer artifact opening, artifact reading, artifact hashing, artifact digest comparison, artifact size comparison, artifact verification, artifact binding, tokenizer manifest loading, tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenizer artifact binding contract Stage-23 before tokenizer artifact opening, artifact reading, artifact hashing, artifact verification, artifact binding, tokenizer runtime attachment, tokenizer manifest loading, tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia tokenizer runtime attachment contract Stage-24 before tokenizer artifact opening, artifact reading, artifact hashing, tokenizer artifact binding, tokenizer runtime attachment, runtime session creation, tokenizer manifest loading, tokenizer file access, tokenizer vocabulary loading, prompt tokenization, prompt evaluation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt tokenization contract Stage-25 before prompt text reading, prompt token creation, prompt token sequence recording, tokenizer runtime attachment, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt token sequence contract Stage-26 before prompt token ID recording, token order recording, token offset recording, context window assembly, prompt evaluation input creation, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia context window assembly contract Stage-27 before context window assembly, prompt evaluation input creation, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation input contract Stage-28 before prompt evaluation input creation, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation runtime handoff contract Stage-29 before runtime handoff, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation invocation contract Stage-30 before invocation request creation, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result contract Stage-31 before result recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result review contract Stage-32 before result-review recording, result recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result disposition contract Stage-33 before disposition recording, release recording, result-review recording, result recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release contract Stage-34 before release recording, release decision recording, release publication, release packaging, release receipt creation, disposition recording, result-review recording, result recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt contract Stage-35 before receipt recording, receipt signing, receipt publication, release recording, release decision recording, release publication, release packaging, disposition recording, result-review recording, result recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review contract Stage-36 before review recording, review decision recording, review findings recording, receipt recording, receipt signing, receipt publication, release recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition contract Stage-37 before disposition recording, disposition decision recording, disposition findings recording, review recording, review decision recording, review findings recording, receipt recording, receipt signing, receipt publication, release recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-38 before disposition-release recording, release decision recording, release publication, release packaging, release receipt creation, disposition recording, review recording, receipt recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review contract Stage-40 before release-receipt-review recording, review decisions, review findings, review dispositions, receipt emission, receipt signing, receipt publication, disposition-release recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition contract Stage-41 before release-receipt-review-disposition recording, review decisions, review findings, review dispositions, receipt emission, receipt signing, receipt publication, disposition-release recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-42 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release recording, release decisions, release publication, release receipts, review decisions, review findings, review dispositions, receipt emission, receipt signing, receipt publication, disposition-release recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt contract Stage-43 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt recording, receipt emission, receipt signing, receipt publication, release records, review records, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review contract Stage-44 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review recording, review decisions, review findings, receipt signing, receipt publication, receipt packaging, disposition recording, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition contract Stage-45 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition recording, disposition decisions, disposition findings, receipt signing, receipt publication, receipt packaging, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-46 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition-release recording, release decisions, release publication, release packaging, release receipt creation, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt contract Stage-47 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt recording, receipt emission, receipt signing, receipt publication, receipt packaging, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review contract Stage-48 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review recording, review decisions, review findings, receipt signing, receipt publication, receipt packaging, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition contract Stage-49 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition recording, disposition decisions, disposition findings, receipt signing, receipt publication, receipt packaging, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release contract Stage-50 before release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition-release-receipt-review-disposition-release recording, release decisions, release publication, release packaging, release receipt creation, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - Nadia prompt evaluation result release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt review disposition release receipt contract Stage-51 before release-receipt records, receipt emission, receipt signing, receipt publication, receipt packaging, release records, review records, model-output recording, runtime invocation, prompt evaluation, dialogue generation, token generation, inference, or tool execution; - L-UI rendering implementation; - L-UI rendering detailed report refinement; - L-UI rendering README/status alignment; - L-UI completion estimate review; - Nucleus task execution contract; - Nucleus task execution implementation plan; - Nucleus task execution implementation; - Nucleus task report refinement; - Nucleus task no-effect report alignment; - Nucleus task README/status alignment; - Nucleus task report-only execution refinement; - Nucleus task report-only execution README/status alignment; - Runtime boundary contract; - Runtime boundary implementation plan; - Runtime boundary implementation; - Runtime boundary refinement plan; - Runtime boundary refinement implementation; - Runtime boundary report refinement; - Runtime boundary policy matrix refinement; - Runtime boundary domain matrix refinement; - Runtime boundary domain matrix report integration; - Runtime boundary Lat pipeline comment evidence integration; - Latticra Seal README status row alignment; - Latticra Seal capability gate status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal capability gate predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal effect decision status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal runtime handoff status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal runtime handoff predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal runtime handoff report status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal status rollup status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal status rollup predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal agentic automation security public-entrypoint alignment; - Latticra Seal agentic automation security predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal parameter schema status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal parameter schema predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal request freshness status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal request freshness predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal signed request status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal signed request predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal policy decision status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal policy decision predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal operator receipt report predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal local capability registry schema report surface/status checkpoint; - Latticra Seal Panel dashboard planning checkpoint; - Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model contract; - Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation plan; - Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation; - Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model surface/status; - Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path contract; - Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path implementation; - Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path surface/status; - Defensive threat model validation refinement; - Runtime boundary abuse-case fixture expansion after policy expansion; - Completion estimate review README/status alignment; - Completion estimate review after runtime-boundary abuse-case fixtures; - Latticra Seal verification receipt status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal verification receipt predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal crypto verify backend status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal Ed25519 verify-only status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal verified receipt promotion status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal verified capability gate status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal verified effect decision status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal runtime handoff evaluation status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal runtime handoff report status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal verification policy predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal verification policy status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal key parsing predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal key parsing status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal bounded no-effect key parsing implementation; - Latticra Seal future key parsing implementation plan; - Latticra Seal future key parsing implementation contract; - Latticra Seal public-key parsing predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal public-key parsing status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal public-key parsing metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal public-key parsing boundary contract; - Latticra Seal key-material predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal key-material status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal key-material metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal key-material boundary contract; - Latticra Seal key-handling predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal key-handling status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal key-handling metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal key-handling boundary contract; - Latticra Seal signing operation predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal signing operation status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal signing operation metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal signing operation contract; - Latticra Seal signer invocation predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal signer invocation status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal signer invocation metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal signer invocation contract; - Latticra Seal signer handoff predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal signer handoff status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal signer handoff metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal signer handoff contract; - Latticra Seal signing authorization predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal signing authorization status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal signing authorization metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal signing authorization contract; - Latticra Seal signature request predecessor status alignment; - Latticra Seal signature request status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal signature request metadata implementation; - Latticra Seal signature request contract; - Latticra Seal report envelope status/public-entry alignment; - Latticra Seal report envelope metadata implementation; - deterministic diagnostics; - source-span metadata; - semantic validation implementation; - Lat semantic diagnostics refinement; - LIR shape implementation; - LIR report refinement; - Lat grammar implementation; - Lat grammar report metadata integration; - Lat grammar line-comment metadata refinement; - Lat grammar unsupported block-comment rejection refinement; - Lat pipeline comment metadata integration; - Lat pipeline diagnostic comment metadata integration; - Lat parse-failure comment evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline failure span evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline parse-error evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline semantic-error evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline downstream stage-error evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline stage-summary evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline module/count evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline first-declaration evidence propagation; - Lat pipeline first-clause evidence propagation; - Lat LIR edge-kind evidence propagation; - Lat LIR no-effect evidence propagation; - Lat LIR module-summary evidence propagation; - Lat LIR module label evidence propagation; - Lat LIR source-span evidence propagation; - Lat LIR node-kind evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-node evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-node topology evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-node span evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-node evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-node topology evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-node span evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-edge evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-edge endpoint evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-edge endpoint payload evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-edge endpoint topology evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first-edge span evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-source edge evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint payload evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint topology evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint span evidence propagation; - Lat LIR first transition-source edge span evidence propagation; - Runtime boundary Lat pipeline comment evidence integration; - Lat semantic validation foundation; - Lat model normalization implementation; - Lat model report declaration metadata integration; - Lat model report clause metadata integration; - Lat-to-LIR lowering contract; - Lat-to-LIR lowering implementation plan; - Lat-to-LIR lowering implementation; - Lat pipeline contract; - Lat pipeline implementation plan; - Lat pipeline implementation; - Lat pipeline model normalization integration; - Lat-to-LIR model lowering integration; - Lat-to-LIR declaration metadata refinement; - Lat-to-LIR diagnostic refinement; - Lat-to-LIR diagnostic declaration metadata integration; - Lat pipeline lowering diagnostic integration; - Lat-to-LIR clause metadata refinement; - Lat-to-LIR diagnostic clause metadata integration; - Lat pipeline diagnostic declaration metadata integration; - Lat pipeline diagnostic clause metadata integration; - Lat pipeline report declaration metadata integration; - Lat pipeline report clause metadata integration; - Lat pipeline report refinement; - Lat pipeline diagnostic integration refinement; - Lat pipeline diagnostic integration main test audit; - Lat-specific LIR refinement contract; - Lat-specific LIR refinement implementation plan; - Lat-specific LIR refinement implementation; - project notes current-direction alignment; - project notes upcoming-work alignment; - project notes index alignment; - status and announcement consistency review; - completion percentage review; - strategy estimate review; - no-effect preview boundaries. Lat now has a bounded no-effect path from grammar parsing to semantic validation to model normalization to LIR metadata lowering. The grammar report preserves first declaration, first clause, and line-comment metadata from successful AST parses, and block-comment openers outside strings/line comments now fail with `unsupported_block_comment`; the current pipeline report also carries parser line-comment count and first-comment span metadata. The current lowering implementation consumes normalized Lat model metadata directly, creates a `lat_module` LIR module shape, preserves source spans, no-effect flags, model counts, first lowered declaration metadata, and transition source indices, and emits deterministic lowering reports. The older parser-plus-semantic lowering entry point remains available as a compatibility wrapper. The Lat model normalization implementation builds typed declaration and clause index tables for states, policies, transitions, assertions, and effect declarations after semantic validation. It preserves first normalized declaration metadata, first normalized clause role/effect/name/operator/value report metadata, source spans, and no-effect flags without reading source bytes, executing Lat, or changing lowering behavior. The Lat-to-LIR diagnostic refinement classifies lowering outcomes as valid, parse, semantic, model, effect-check, capacity, LIR, or internal. It copies model errors, lowering errors, optional LIR errors, model counts, transition source metadata, first lowered declaration metadata, first-clause metadata, no-effect flags, and evidence level into deterministic diagnostic reports without changing lowering behavior. The Lat-to-LIR clause metadata refinement preserves clause operators in LIR node metadata and exposes first lowered clause role, effect, name, operator, value, and node index in deterministic lowering reports without evaluating operators or adding execution. The Lat semantic diagnostics refinement adds deterministic diagnostic classes, category counters, first-diagnostic declaration/clause indices, and report fields. This makes semantic failures easier to audit without changing validation outcomes or adding execution. The Lat pipeline composes source parsing, semantic validation, Lat model normalization, model-driven Lat-to-LIR lowering, LIR metadata, and deterministic pipeline reporting into one no-effect integration boundary. It preserves metadata visibility without executing Lat, executing LIR, mutating state, or providing runtime behavior. The Lat pipeline lowering diagnostic integration extends the companion pipeline diagnostic surface with parser line-comment count and first-comment span metadata, optional Lat-to-LIR diagnostic class, lowering error, model error, LIR error, model counts, transition source metadata, first lowered declaration metadata, first lowered clause metadata, and failure flags while preserving the older evaluator for existing callers. The Lat pipeline report refinement adds deterministic stage-summary metadata for last completed stage, failed stage, per-stage OK flags, model normalization status, no-effect-chain status, evidence level, parser line-comment count plus first-comment span metadata, first lowered declaration kind/name/source/index/clause metadata, and first lowered clause role/effect/name/operator/value/node metadata. The current runtime-boundary Lat LIR first transition-node span, Lat LIR first transition-node topology, Lat LIR first transition-node, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint payload, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint topology, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint span, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint, Lat LIR first transition-source edge span, Lat LIR first transition-source edge, Lat LIR first-edge span, Lat LIR first-edge endpoint topology, Lat LIR first-edge endpoint payload, Lat LIR first-edge endpoint, Lat LIR first-edge, Lat LIR first-node span, Lat LIR first-node topology, Lat LIR first-node, Lat LIR node-kind, Lat LIR source-span, Lat LIR module label, Lat LIR module-summary, Lat LIR no-effect, Lat LIR edge-kind, first-clause, first-declaration, module/count, and stage-summary evidence propagation copies LIR first Lat-derived transition node source span, LIR first Lat-derived transition node topology, LIR first Lat-derived transition node identity, LIR first Lat-derived transition-source endpoint node values/operators/bindings, LIR first Lat-derived transition-source endpoint node topology, LIR first Lat-derived transition-source endpoint node source spans, LIR first Lat-derived transition-source endpoint node kinds and names, LIR first Lat-derived transition-source edge source span, LIR first Lat-derived transition-source edge identity, LIR first Lat-derived edge source span, LIR first Lat-derived edge endpoint node topology, LIR first Lat-derived edge endpoint node values/operators/bindings, LIR first Lat-derived edge endpoint identity, LIR first Lat-derived edge identity, LIR first Lat-derived node source span, LIR first Lat-derived node topology, LIR first Lat-derived node identity, LIR node-kind counts, LIR source span, LIR card/effect/boundary labels, LIR module name, report classification, shape kind, core LIR counts, LIR no-effect flags, LIR contains/binds/annotates/orders-before/transition edge counts, first lowered clause metadata, first lowered declaration metadata, module identity, parser counts, model counts, and stage-summary metadata into runtime-boundary Lat pipeline records/reports so boundary denials and approvals preserve the same audit shape without changing no-effect behavior. The Lat pipeline diagnostic integration refinement adds a companion diagnostic integration surface that combines pipeline error/stage state with parser line-comment count and first-comment span metadata, Lat semantic diagnostic class, semantic error, diagnostic count, first-diagnostic indices, model-stage classification, optional Lat-to-LIR diagnostic metadata, first lowered declaration metadata, and first lowered clause role/effect/name/operator/value/node metadata while preserving no-execution behavior. The Lat pipeline diagnostic main test audit verifies that the companion diagnostic integration is covered by both the focused guard and the main Lat pipeline test runner. The Lat-specific LIR refinement gives Lat declarations explicit LIR node kinds and a transition-source edge kind. This improves inspectability of Lat-derived LIR without changing no-effect behavior or adding execution. The language representation review confirms that the Lat, LIR, and L-UI representation stack is stable enough for a bounded no-effect Nucleus report/refinement slice, while still forbidding Lat execution, LIR execution, runtime behavior, command execution, mutation, file I/O, network I/O, recovery behavior, and hardware behavior. The LIR report refinement adds deterministic report classification, graph-shape labels, edge-kind summary counts, no-effect-chain status, and evidence level while preserving lowering outcomes and non-execution behavior. The L-UI rendering detailed report refinement adds explicit report classification, detail level, detailed-report availability, detailed section count, deterministic section sequence, no-effect-chain status, and evidence level to the no-effect renderer report surface. The L-UI rendering README/status alignment makes that detailed-report refinement discoverable from the README and status index without changing implementation behavior. The L-UI completion estimate review conservatively updates planning estimates after the no-effect renderer report metadata and validation work. It does not change runtime, security-hardening, authority, or product-readiness estimates. The C++ authority expansion contract review records that no new expansion contract is needed because no new authority behavior has been proposed. The authority implementation review confirms the constrained C++ authority layer remains no-effect, metadata-only, fixed-capacity, and denied-by-default. The authority status/docs alignment makes the authority review status discoverable from the status index and detailed status surface. The authority announcement review confirms that no separate public authority announcement is needed because no authority behavior or messaging posture changed beyond the already-recorded no-effect review sequence. The authority foundation index alignment makes the authority review and review status visible from the main foundation index. The public entry-point consistency scan refreshes README and status-index references after the recent authority/status/foundation/announcement slices. The project notes follow-up alignment refreshes the current-direction note, upcoming-work queue, and project-notes index after the public entry-point consistency scan. The project notes follow-up status/index check verifies that the project-notes refresh is represented from the status index and detailed status surface. The Nucleus task report refinement adds deterministic report classification, task-domain labeling, authorization-state labeling, prerequisite status, and no-effect-chain status. This makes Nucleus task reports easier to audit while preserving no-effect behavior. The Nucleus task no-effect report alignment adds explicit report-alignment, no-effect-policy, and representation-gate labels to Nucleus task records and deterministic reports while preserving non-execution behavior. The Nucleus task README/status alignment makes that no-effect report alignment discoverable from README and the status index without changing implementation behavior. The Nucleus task report-only execution refinement adds explicit execution-status, effect-status, and runtime-status labels to Nucleus task records and deterministic reports while preserving no-effect, non-executing behavior. The Nucleus task report-only execution README/status alignment makes the report-only execution refinement discoverable from README, root status, current status, status index, and foundation index without changing implementation behavior. The project notes Nucleus report-only alignment refreshes current direction, upcoming work, and the project-notes index after the Nucleus task report-only execution README/status alignment. The project notes Nucleus report-only status/index check verifies that the project-notes Nucleus report-only alignment is represented from root status, detailed current status, the status index, and the foundation index without changing implementation behavior or completion estimates. The Nucleus report-only announcement review confirms that no separate public announcement entry is needed because the recent Nucleus report-only and project-notes slices were documentation/status alignment only, with no capability posture or public-product-readiness change. The Nucleus report-only announcement README alignment makes the no-new-announcement review discoverable from README and the project-notes index without adding a public announcement entry or changing implementation behavior. The project notes Nucleus announcement README status/index check verifies that the project-note body alignment after the Nucleus announcement README alignment is represented from root status, detailed current status, the status index, and the foundation index without changing implementation behavior or completion estimates. The Runtime boundary refinement implementation reports Lat pipeline evidence, Lat pipeline line-comment count and first-comment span evidence, Lat-specific LIR module-summary evidence, Lat-specific LIR module label evidence, Lat-specific LIR source-span evidence, Lat-specific LIR node-kind evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-node evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-node topology evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-node span evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-node evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-node topology evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-node span evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-edge evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-edge endpoint evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-edge endpoint payload evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-edge endpoint topology evidence, Lat-specific LIR first-edge span evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-source edge evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-source edge endpoint evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-source edge endpoint payload evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-source edge endpoint topology evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-source edge endpoint span evidence, Lat-specific LIR first transition-source edge span evidence, Lat-specific LIR no-effect evidence, and Lat-specific LIR edge-kind evidence at the runtime boundary while preserving disabled-by-default, no-effect classification behavior. The Runtime boundary report refinement adds explicit report classification, boundary-domain labeling, authorization-state labeling, and evidence-level reporting so boundary intent is visible without granting runtime authority. The Runtime boundary policy matrix refinement adds explicit policy-matrix cell labels plus effect, mode, authority, and future-gate report fields so the runtime-boundary decision shape is easier to audit without changing denied-by-default behavior. The Runtime boundary domain matrix refinement adds a companion domain matrix evaluator for classifying resolved boundary domains as declarative, operational, future-gated, blocked, invalid, or unknown. The Runtime boundary domain matrix report integration adds deterministic report rendering for domain-matrix cell, domain label, domain flags, effect-allowed state, authority-available state, and evidence level. The Latticra Seal report envelope implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready runtime handoff report metadata into sealed-report-only or sealed-evaluate-only envelope states while preserving no signing, no runtime handoff, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal report envelope status record makes the existing metadata-only envelope readiness classification visible from public entry points while preserving no signing, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. When crypto graduation evidence is present on runtime handoff report metadata, the envelope requires that evidence to remain passed, standard-aligned, and authority-neutral. Current report envelope fields: ```text seal_report_envelope_contract_present=1 seal_report_envelope_implementation_present=1 seal_report_envelope_status_present=1 envelope_profile=latticra-seal-report-envelope/0.1 report_profile=latticra-seal-runtime-handoff-report/0.1 requested_envelope=report-only report_envelope_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 report_envelope_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 report_envelope_standard_expectations_met=1 report_envelope_authority_promotion_allowed=0 report_envelope_ready=1 report_envelope_state=sealed-report-only report_envelope_signature_performed=0 report_envelope_handoff_performed=0 report_envelope_effect_performed=0 report_envelope_runtime_authority_granted=0 report_envelope_host_read_performed=0 report_envelope_host_write_performed=0 report_envelope_network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 trust_store_behavior_added=0 revocation_lookup_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signature request contract defines the next metadata-only request boundary after sealed report-envelope metadata. It permits only a future signature request metadata implementation and does not add signing, verification, private-key handling, host behavior, network behavior, capability enforcement, or runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signature request implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying allowed future signing requests after sealed report-envelope metadata while preserving no signing, no verification, no private-key handling, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signature request status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no signing, no verification, no private-key handling, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signature request predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded report-envelope status predecessor while preserving no signing, no signature verification, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no key generation, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. When crypto graduation evidence is present on the sealed report-envelope predecessor, the signature request requires that evidence to remain passed, standard-aligned, and authority-neutral. Current signature request predecessor status fields: ```text seal_report_envelope_status_present=1 seal_signature_request_status_present=1 signature_request_predecessor_report_envelope_status_present=1 signature_request_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 signature_request_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 signature_request_standard_expectations_met=1 signature_request_authority_promotion_allowed=0 signature_request_ready=1 signature_request_state=requested-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 private_key_handling=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signing authorization contract defines the next metadata-only classification boundary after signature-request readiness while preserving no signing, no verification, no private-key handling, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signing authorization implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready signature requests as authorized-metadata-only for a future signing path while preserving no signing, no verification, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signing authorization status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no signing, no verification, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signing authorization predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded signature-request status predecessor, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no signing, no signature verification, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no key generation, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current signing authorization predecessor status fields: ```text seal_signature_request_status_present=1 seal_signing_authorization_status_present=1 signing_authorization_predecessor_signature_request_status_present=1 signing_authorization_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 signing_authorization_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 signing_authorization_standard_expectations_met=1 signing_authorization_authority_promotion_allowed=0 signature_request_ready=1 signature_request_state=requested-metadata-only signing_authorization_ready=1 signing_authorization_state=authorized-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signer handoff contract defines the next metadata-only classification boundary after signing authorization readiness while preserving no signing, no verification, no signer invocation, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signer handoff implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready signing authorizations as handoff-metadata-only for a future signer path while preserving no signing, no verification, no signer invocation, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signer handoff status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no signing, no verification, no signer invocation, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signer handoff predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded signing-authorization status predecessor, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no key generation, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current signer handoff predecessor status fields: ```text seal_signing_authorization_status_present=1 seal_signer_handoff_status_present=1 signer_handoff_predecessor_signing_authorization_status_present=1 signer_handoff_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 signer_handoff_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 signer_handoff_standard_expectations_met=1 signer_handoff_authority_promotion_allowed=0 signing_authorization_ready=1 signing_authorization_state=authorized-metadata-only signer_handoff_ready=1 signer_handoff_state=handoff-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 signer_invocation_behavior_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signer invocation contract defines the next metadata-only classification boundary after signer handoff readiness while preserving no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signer invocation implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready signer handoffs as invocation-metadata-only for a future signer path while preserving no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signer invocation status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signer invocation predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded signer-handoff status predecessor, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no key generation, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current signer invocation predecessor status fields: ```text seal_signer_handoff_status_present=1 seal_signer_invocation_status_present=1 signer_invocation_predecessor_signer_handoff_status_present=1 signer_invocation_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 signer_invocation_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 signer_invocation_standard_expectations_met=1 signer_invocation_authority_promotion_allowed=0 signer_handoff_ready=1 signer_handoff_state=handoff-metadata-only signer_invocation_ready=1 signer_invocation_state=invocation-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 signer_invocation_behavior_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signing operation contract defines the next metadata-only classification boundary after signer invocation readiness while preserving no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signing operation implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready signer invocation metadata as operation-metadata-only for a future signing operation path, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signing operation status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signing operation predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded signer-invocation status predecessor, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no key generation, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current signing operation predecessor status fields: ```text seal_signer_invocation_status_present=1 seal_signing_operation_status_present=1 signing_operation_predecessor_signer_invocation_status_present=1 signing_operation_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 signing_operation_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 signing_operation_standard_expectations_met=1 signing_operation_authority_promotion_allowed=0 signer_invocation_ready=1 signer_invocation_state=invocation-metadata-only signing_operation_ready=1 signing_operation_state=operation-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 signer_invocation_behavior_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal key-handling boundary contract defines the next metadata-only classification boundary after signing operation readiness while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key-handling implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready signing operation metadata as key-handling-metadata-only for a future key-handling path, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key-handling status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key-handling predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded signing-operation status predecessor, preserves crypto graduation evidence when present, and still preserves no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current key-handling predecessor status fields: ```text seal_signing_operation_status_present=1 seal_key_handling_status_present=1 key_handling_predecessor_signing_operation_status_present=1 key_handling_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 key_handling_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 key_handling_standard_expectations_met=1 key_handling_authority_promotion_allowed=0 signing_operation_ready=1 signing_operation_state=operation-metadata-only key_handling_ready=1 key_handling_state=key-handling-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 public_key_parsed=0 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 signer_invocation_behavior_added=0 public_key_parsing_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal key-material boundary contract defines the metadata-only classification boundary after key-handling readiness while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key-material implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready key-handling metadata as key-material-metadata-only for a future key-material path while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key-material status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key-material predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded key-handling status predecessor while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current key-material predecessor status fields: ```text seal_key_handling_status_present=1 seal_key_material_status_present=1 key_material_predecessor_key_handling_status_present=1 key_handling_ready=1 key_handling_state=key-handling-metadata-only key_material_ready=1 key_material_state=key-material-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 public_key_parsed=0 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 signer_invocation_behavior_added=0 public_key_parsing_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal public-key parsing boundary contract defines the next metadata-only classification boundary after key-material status readiness while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal public-key parsing implementation adds bounded C metadata for classifying ready key-material metadata as public-key-parsing-metadata-only for a future public-key parsing path while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal public-key parsing status record makes the metadata-only implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal public-key parsing predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded key-material status predecessor while preserving no public-key parsing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current public-key parsing predecessor status fields: ```text seal_key_material_status_present=1 seal_public_key_parsing_status_present=1 public_key_parsing_predecessor_key_material_status_present=1 key_material_ready=1 key_material_state=key-material-metadata-only public_key_parsing_ready=1 public_key_parsing_state=public-key-parsing-metadata-only signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 public_key_parsed=0 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 signer_invocation_behavior_added=0 public_key_parsing_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal future key parsing implementation contract defines the next planning boundary after public-key parsing status readiness while preserving no public-key parsing implementation, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal future key parsing implementation plan defines the exact future bounded no-effect key parsing API, file paths, record fields, accepted public-key byte formats, failure behavior, report shape, and tests while still adding no parser code, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no signing, no verification, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no runtime authority in this slice. The Latticra Seal bounded key parsing implementation adds fixed-size caller-provided Ed25519 public-key byte metadata after public-key parsing status readiness while preserving no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key parsing status record makes the bounded public-key byte metadata implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no signing, no verification, no signer invocation behavior, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal key parsing predecessor status alignment ties that bounded status record to the guarded public-key parsing status predecessor while preserving the existing caller-provided public-key byte metadata behavior, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current key parsing predecessor status fields: ```text seal_public_key_parsing_status_present=1 seal_key_parsing_status_present=1 key_parsing_predecessor_public_key_parsing_status_present=1 public_key_parsing_ready=1 public_key_parsing_state=public-key-parsing-metadata-only key_parsing_ready=1 key_parsing_state=public-key-parsed-metadata-only public_key_parsed=1 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 signature_performed=0 verification_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 signing_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 signer_invocation_behavior_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal verification policy status record makes the existing metadata-only verification policy implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no cryptographic verification, no signing, no public-key byte verification, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal verification policy predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status record to the guarded key parsing status predecessor while preserving no cryptographic verification, no public-key byte verification, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current verification policy predecessor status fields: ```text seal_key_parsing_status_present=1 seal_verification_policy_status_present=1 verification_policy_predecessor_key_parsing_status_present=1 key_parsing_ready=1 key_parsing_state=public-key-parsed-metadata-only verification_policy_ready=1 verification_state=unsupported cryptographic_verification_supported=0 cryptographic_verification_performed=0 verification_performed=0 public_key_material_handling=0 public_key_bytes_consumed=0 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 signature_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 cryptographic_verification_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal crypto verify backend status record makes the existing authority-neutral crypto verify backend readiness implementation visible from public entry points while preserving verification-not-performed backend behavior, no signing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. Current crypto verify backend fields: ```text seal_crypto_verify_backend_contract_present=1 seal_crypto_verify_backend_implementation_present=1 seal_crypto_verify_backend_status_present=1 crypto_verify_state=ready-local-ed25519 cryptographic_verification_supported=1 cryptographic_verification_performed=0 verified=0 authority_usable=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 real_cryptographic_verification_added=0 ``` The Latticra Seal Ed25519 verify-only status record makes the existing local provider-backed verification result surface visible from public entry points while preserving authority-neutral behavior, no signing, no key handling, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, and no production cryptography claim. Current Ed25519 verify-only fields: ```text seal_ed25519_verify_only_contract_present=1 seal_ed25519_verify_implementation_present=1 seal_ed25519_verify_status_present=1 ed25519_verify_profile=latticra-seal-ed25519-verify/0.1 ed25519_cryptographic_verification_performed=1 ed25519_authority_usable=0 crypto_verify_state=verified cryptographic_verification_supported=1 cryptographic_verification_performed=1 verified=1 authority_usable=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 implementation_behavior_changed=0 signing_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 trust_store_behavior_added=0 revocation_lookup_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 production_cryptography_claimed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal verified receipt promotion status record makes the existing metadata promotion surface visible from public entry points while preserving authority-neutral behavior, no capability authorization, no effect execution, no runtime authority, and no production cryptography claim. Current verified receipt promotion fields: ```text seal_verified_receipt_promotion_contract_present=1 seal_verified_receipt_promotion_implementation_present=1 seal_verified_receipt_promotion_status_present=1 receipt_profile=latticra-seal-verified-receipt/0.1 verify_profile=latticra-seal-ed25519-verify/0.1 verification_state=verified receipt_state=verified verified_receipt_promotion_cryptographic_verification_performed=1 verified_receipt_promotion_authority_usable=0 cryptographic_verification_supported=1 cryptographic_verification_performed=1 verified=1 authority_usable=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 capability_authorization_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 signing_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 trust_store_behavior_added=0 revocation_lookup_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal crypto graduation gate status record makes the current local Ed25519 verify-only result and verified receipt promotion pass through explicit cryptographic assurance expectations while preserving authority-neutral behavior, no capability authorization, no effect execution, no runtime authority, and no production cryptography claim. Current crypto graduation gate fields: ```text seal_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 crypto_graduation_profile=latticra-seal-crypto-graduation-gate/0.1 assurance_baseline_profile=latticra-cryptographic-assurance-key-management/0.1 verify_profile=latticra-seal-ed25519-verify/0.1 receipt_profile=latticra-seal-verified-receipt/0.1 signature_algorithm=Ed25519-development message_digest_algorithm=SHA-256 provider_backed_verification_required=1 deterministic_test_vector_required=1 negative_test_vector_required=1 rfc8032_test_vector_tracked=1 fips_186_5_signature_standard_tracked=1 fips_180_4_digest_standard_tracked=1 fips_140_3_claim_gate_required=1 sp_800_57_key_management_required=1 sp_800_131a_transition_review_required=1 fips_204_ml_dsa_planning_tracked=1 fips_205_slh_dsa_planning_tracked=1 cryptographic_verification_performed=1 local_verify_graduated=1 receipt_promotion_graduated=1 standard_expectations_met=1 production_crypto_claim_allowed=0 fips_claim_allowed=0 signing_authority_granted=0 key_generation_allowed=0 key_storage_allowed=0 authority_promotion_allowed=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 gate_state=graduated-authority-neutral ``` The Latticra Seal verified capability gate status record makes the existing metadata-only gate evaluation visible from public entry points while preserving no capability enforcement, no effect execution, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. The stricter entry point now requires a passing crypto graduation gate before recording the same metadata-only allowance. Current verified capability gate fields: ```text seal_verified_capability_gate_contract_present=1 seal_verified_capability_gate_implementation_present=1 seal_verified_capability_gate_status_present=1 gate_profile=latticra-seal-verified-capability-gate/0.1 receipt_profile=latticra-seal-verified-receipt/0.1 verify_profile=latticra-seal-ed25519-verify/0.1 crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 standard_expectations_met=1 local_verify_graduated=1 receipt_promotion_graduated=1 authority_promotion_allowed=0 requested_capability=verified-receipt-report requested_effect=report-only verified_capability_gate_allowed=1 verified_capability_gate_state=allowed-metadata-only gate_state=allowed-metadata-only verified_capability_gate_runtime_authority_granted=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 verified_capability_gate_effect_performed=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 signing_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 trust_store_behavior_added=0 revocation_lookup_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal runtime handoff report status record makes the existing metadata-only report readiness classification visible from public entry points while preserving no runtime handoff execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. When crypto graduation evidence is present on runtime handoff evaluation, the report requires that evidence to remain passed, standard-aligned, and authority-neutral. Current runtime handoff report fields: ```text seal_runtime_handoff_report_contract_present=1 seal_runtime_handoff_report_implementation_present=1 seal_runtime_handoff_report_status_present=1 report_profile=latticra-seal-runtime-handoff-report/0.1 handoff_profile=latticra-seal-runtime-handoff-evaluation/0.1 requested_report=report-only handoff_state=eligible-report-only handoff_eligible=1 runtime_handoff_report_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 runtime_handoff_report_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 runtime_handoff_report_standard_expectations_met=1 runtime_handoff_report_authority_promotion_allowed=0 runtime_handoff_report_ready=1 runtime_handoff_report_state=ready-report-only runtime_handoff_report_handoff_performed=0 runtime_handoff_report_effect_performed=0 runtime_handoff_report_runtime_authority_granted=0 runtime_handoff_report_host_read_performed=0 runtime_handoff_report_host_write_performed=0 runtime_handoff_report_network_performed=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 signing_added=0 key_generation_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 trust_store_behavior_added=0 revocation_lookup_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal verified effect decision status record makes the existing metadata-only effect classification visible from public entry points while preserving no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. When crypto graduation evidence is present on the verified capability gate, the decision requires that evidence to remain passed, standard-aligned, and authority-neutral. Current verified effect decision fields: ```text seal_verified_effect_decision_contract_present=1 seal_verified_effect_decision_implementation_present=1 seal_verified_effect_decision_status_present=1 decision_profile=latticra-seal-verified-effect-decision/0.1 gate_profile=latticra-seal-verified-capability-gate/0.1 requested_capability=verified-receipt-report requested_effect=report-only verified_effect_decision_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 verified_effect_decision_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 verified_effect_decision_standard_expectations_met=1 verified_effect_decision_authority_promotion_allowed=0 verified_effect_decision_allowed=1 verified_effect_decision_state=allowed-report-only verified_effect_decision_effect_performed=0 verified_effect_decision_runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_allowed=1 effect_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal runtime handoff evaluation status record makes the existing metadata-only handoff eligibility classification visible from public entry points while preserving no runtime handoff execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. When crypto graduation evidence is present on the verified effect decision, the evaluation requires that evidence to remain passed, standard-aligned, and authority-neutral. Current runtime handoff evaluation fields: ```text seal_runtime_handoff_evaluation_contract_present=1 seal_runtime_handoff_evaluation_implementation_present=1 seal_runtime_handoff_evaluation_status_present=1 handoff_profile=latticra-seal-runtime-handoff-evaluation/0.1 decision_profile=latticra-seal-verified-effect-decision/0.1 requested_capability=verified-receipt-report requested_effect=report-only requested_handoff=report-only runtime_handoff_evaluation_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 runtime_handoff_evaluation_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 runtime_handoff_evaluation_standard_expectations_met=1 runtime_handoff_evaluation_authority_promotion_allowed=0 runtime_handoff_evaluation_eligible=1 runtime_handoff_evaluation_state=eligible-report-only runtime_handoff_evaluation_handoff_performed=0 runtime_handoff_evaluation_runtime_authority_granted=0 handoff_eligible=1 handoff_performed=0 effect_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal verification receipt status record makes the existing metadata-only, unverified verification receipt implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no host behavior, no network behavior, no capability enforcement, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal verification receipt predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only receipt status record to the guarded verification policy status predecessor while preserving no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no public-key byte verification, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime handoff execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production cryptography claim. Current verification receipt predecessor status fields: ```text seal_verification_policy_status_present=1 seal_verification_receipt_status_present=1 verification_receipt_predecessor_verification_policy_status_present=1 verification_policy_ready=1 verification_receipt_ready=1 verification_state=unsupported receipt_state=unverified-metadata cryptographic_verification_supported=0 cryptographic_verification_performed=0 verification_performed=0 verified=0 authority_usable=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 public_key_material_handling=0 public_key_bytes_consumed=0 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 signature_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 cryptographic_verification_added=0 verified_receipt_authority_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal capability gate status record makes the existing metadata-only denied capability gate implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no capability enforcement, no effect execution, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal capability gate predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only denied capability gate status record to the guarded verification receipt status predecessor while preserving no capability enforcement, no effect execution, no runtime handoff execution, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no public-key byte verification, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no runtime authority, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current capability gate predecessor status fields: ```text seal_verification_receipt_status_present=1 seal_capability_gate_status_present=1 verification_receipt_predecessor_verification_policy_status_present=1 capability_gate_predecessor_verification_receipt_status_present=1 verification_receipt_ready=1 capability_gate_ready=1 receipt_state=unverified-metadata gate_state=denied-unverified verified=0 authority_usable=0 receipt_capability_gate_allowed=0 gate_allowed=0 capability_enforcement_performed=0 effect_allowed=0 effect_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 cryptographic_verification_performed=0 verification_performed=0 public_key_material_handling=0 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 signature_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 cryptographic_verification_added=0 verified_receipt_authority_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 ``` The Latticra Seal effect decision status record makes the existing metadata-only denied effect decision implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no runtime handoff execution, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no runtime authority. Latticra Seal effect decision predecessor status alignment records that the denied metadata-only effect decision remains tied to the guarded capability gate status predecessor. ```text effect_decision_predecessor_capability_gate_status_present=1 ``` The Latticra Seal runtime handoff status record makes the existing inactive metadata-only runtime handoff implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no runtime authority. Latticra Seal runtime handoff predecessor status alignment records that the inactive metadata-only runtime handoff remains tied to the guarded effect decision status predecessor. ```text runtime_handoff_predecessor_effect_decision_status_present=1 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 runtime_authority_added=0 cryptographic_verification_added=0 verified_receipt_authority_added=0 signature_verification_added=0 public_key_byte_verification_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 policy_persistence_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal runtime handoff report status/public-entry alignment makes the existing metadata-only runtime handoff report implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no runtime handoff execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no runtime authority. ```text seal_runtime_handoff_report_status_present=1 runtime_handoff_report_crypto_graduation_gate_present=1 runtime_handoff_report_crypto_graduation_gate_passed=1 runtime_handoff_report_standard_expectations_met=1 runtime_handoff_report_authority_promotion_allowed=0 runtime_handoff_report_ready=1 runtime_handoff_report_state=ready-report-only runtime_handoff_report_handoff_performed=0 runtime_handoff_report_runtime_authority_granted=0 ``` The Latticra Seal status rollup status record makes the existing metadata-only status rollup implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal status rollup predecessor status alignment ties that metadata-only status rollup record to the guarded runtime handoff status predecessor while preserving no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no public-key byte verification, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no trust-store behavior, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signature verification, no signer invocation behavior, no signer process execution, no object sealing, no policy persistence, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current status rollup predecessor status fields: ```text seal_runtime_handoff_status_present=1 seal_status_rollup_status_present=1 runtime_handoff_predecessor_effect_decision_status_present=1 status_rollup_predecessor_runtime_handoff_status_present=1 runtime_handoff_ready=1 rollup_state=metadata-only runtime_boundary_state=disabled handoff_active=0 runtime_effect_performed=0 effect_performed=0 capability_enforcement_performed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 cryptographic_verification_performed=0 verification_performed=0 verified=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 effect_allowed=0 key_material_loaded=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 hardware_key_used=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 signature_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 status_rollup_status_added=1 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 runtime_authority_added=0 cryptographic_verification_added=0 verified_receipt_authority_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 object_sealing_added=0 policy_persistence_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal agentic automation security public-entrypoint alignment makes the existing report-only agentic automation security metadata, status/index alignment, and deterministic report surface visible from public entry points while preserving no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, no MCP behavior, no AI agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal agentic automation security predecessor status alignment ties that report-only automation status record to the guarded status rollup status predecessor while preserving no MCP behavior, no AI-agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no public-key byte verification, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no object sealing, no policy persistence, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current agentic automation security predecessor status fields: ```text seal_status_rollup_status_present=1 seal_agentic_automation_security_status_present=1 status_rollup_predecessor_runtime_handoff_status_present=1 agentic_automation_security_predecessor_status_rollup_status_present=1 mcp_protocol_implemented=0 agent_execution_supported=0 model_execution_supported=0 tool_execution_supported=0 shell_execution_supported=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 agentic_automation_security_status_added=1 runtime_execution_added=0 runtime_handoff_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 runtime_authority_added=0 cryptographic_verification_added=0 verified_receipt_authority_added=0 key_material_loading_added=0 private_key_handling_added=0 mcp_behavior_changed=0 agent_execution_added=0 model_execution_added=0 tool_execution_added=0 shell_execution_added=0 network_behavior_changed=0 host_behavior_changed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal parameter schema status record makes the existing report-only parameter schema contract, metadata implementation, and deterministic report surface visible from public entry points while preserving no schema parsing, no schema validation, no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, no MCP behavior, no AI agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal parameter schema predecessor status alignment ties that report-only parameter schema status record to the guarded agentic automation security status predecessor while preserving no schema parsing, no schema validation, no policy evaluation, no policy enforcement, no MCP behavior, no AI-agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no key material loading, no private-key handling, no object sealing, no policy persistence, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current parameter schema predecessor status fields: ```text seal_agentic_automation_security_status_present=1 seal_parameter_schema_status_present=1 agentic_automation_security_predecessor_status_rollup_status_present=1 parameter_schema_predecessor_agentic_automation_security_status_present=1 schema_parsing_supported=0 schema_validation_supported=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 runtime_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 cryptographic_enforcement_added=0 schema_parsing_added=0 schema_validation_added=0 policy_evaluation_added=0 policy_enforcement_added=0 mcp_behavior_changed=0 agent_execution_added=0 model_execution_added=0 tool_execution_added=0 shell_execution_added=0 host_behavior_changed=0 network_behavior_changed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal request freshness status record makes the existing report-only request freshness contract, metadata implementation, and deterministic report surface visible from public entry points while preserving no timestamp parsing, no trusted clock behavior, no nonce storage, no replay-cache storage, no context hashing, no parameter hashing, no freshness validation, no replay detection, no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, no MCP behavior, no AI agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal request freshness predecessor status alignment ties that report-only request freshness status record to the guarded parameter schema status predecessor while preserving no timestamp parsing, no trusted clock behavior, no nonce storage, no replay-cache storage, no context hashing, no parameter hashing, no freshness validation, no replay detection, no signature verification, no signed request enforcement, no policy evaluation, no policy enforcement, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current request freshness predecessor status fields: ```text seal_parameter_schema_status_present=1 seal_request_freshness_status_present=1 parameter_schema_predecessor_agentic_automation_security_status_present=1 request_freshness_predecessor_parameter_schema_status_present=1 request_freshness_supported=0 request_freshness_validation_supported=0 replay_protection_supported=0 request_id_present=0 caller_id_present=0 tool_id_present=0 request_timestamp_present=0 request_expiration_present=0 nonce_present=0 context_hash_present=0 parameter_hash_present=0 freshness_valid=0 replay_detected=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 runtime_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 cryptographic_enforcement_added=0 timestamp_parsing_implemented=0 trusted_clock_behavior_added=0 nonce_storage_added=0 replay_cache_storage_added=0 context_hashing_implemented=0 parameter_hashing_implemented=0 freshness_validation_implemented=0 replay_protection_implemented=0 policy_evaluation_added=0 policy_enforcement_added=0 mcp_behavior_changed=0 agent_execution_added=0 model_execution_added=0 tool_execution_added=0 shell_execution_added=0 host_behavior_changed=0 network_behavior_changed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signed request status record makes the existing report-only signed request contract and metadata implementation visible from public entry points while preserving no signature generation, no signature verification, no public-key parsing, no trust-store loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no revocation lookup, no network trust lookup, no signed request enforcement, no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no verified receipt authority, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, no MCP behavior, no AI agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal signed request predecessor status alignment ties that report-only signed request status record to the guarded request freshness status predecessor while preserving no signature generation, no signature verification, no public-key parsing, no trust-store loading, no private-key handling, no key generation, no hardware-key use, no revocation lookup, no network trust lookup, no signed request enforcement, no policy evaluation, no policy enforcement, no freshness validation, no replay detection, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current signed request predecessor status fields: ```text seal_request_freshness_status_present=1 seal_signed_request_status_present=1 request_freshness_predecessor_parameter_schema_status_present=1 signed_request_predecessor_request_freshness_status_present=1 signed_request_supported=0 signature_generation_supported=0 signature_verification_supported=0 signature_present=0 signature_valid=0 signature_algorithm_declared=0 signing_key_id_present=0 signature_hash_present=0 signed_request_id_present=0 identity_binding_declared=0 context_binding_declared=0 parameter_binding_declared=0 freshness_binding_declared=0 policy_binding_declared=0 trust_store_supported=0 revocation_lookup_supported=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 runtime_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 cryptographic_enforcement_added=0 signature_generation_implemented=0 signature_verification_implemented=0 signed_request_enforcement_implemented=0 trust_store_implemented=0 revocation_lookup_implemented=0 policy_evaluation_added=0 policy_enforcement_added=0 freshness_validation_implemented=0 replay_protection_implemented=0 mcp_behavior_changed=0 agent_execution_added=0 model_execution_added=0 tool_execution_added=0 shell_execution_added=0 host_behavior_changed=0 network_behavior_changed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal policy decision status record makes the existing report-only policy decision contract, metadata implementation, and deterministic report surface visible from public entry points while preserving no real policy evaluation, no policy enforcement, no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no signature verification, no freshness validation, no replay detection, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, no MCP behavior, no AI agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, and no runtime authority. The Latticra Seal policy decision predecessor status alignment ties that report-only policy decision status record to the guarded signed request status predecessor while preserving no policy evaluation, no policy enforcement, no signature verification, no freshness validation, no replay detection, no signed request enforcement, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current policy decision predecessor status fields: ```text seal_signed_request_status_present=1 seal_policy_decision_status_present=1 signed_request_predecessor_request_freshness_status_present=1 policy_decision_predecessor_signed_request_status_present=1 policy_decision_supported=0 policy_evaluation_supported=0 policy_enforcement_supported=0 policy_id_present=0 policy_version_present=0 requested_action_present=0 requested_tool_present=0 signed_request_present=0 signature_valid=0 schema_valid=0 freshness_valid=0 replay_detected=0 default_decision=deny decision_state=report-only decision_allowed=0 decision_denied=1 operator_review_required=1 unknown_tool_denied=1 unsigned_request_denied=1 invalid_schema_denied=1 stale_request_denied=1 replayed_request_denied=1 invalid_signature_denied=1 runtime_authority_granted=0 runtime_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 cryptographic_enforcement_added=0 real_policy_evaluation_added=0 policy_enforcement_added=0 signature_verification_implemented=0 freshness_validation_implemented=0 replay_protection_implemented=0 mcp_behavior_changed=0 agent_execution_added=0 model_execution_added=0 tool_execution_added=0 shell_execution_added=0 host_behavior_changed=0 network_behavior_changed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal operator receipt report predecessor status alignment ties that denied report-only operator receipt status record to the guarded policy decision status predecessor while preserving no receipt file writes, no tool execution, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no signature verification, no freshness validation, no replay detection, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current operator receipt report predecessor status fields: ```text seal_policy_decision_status_present=1 seal_operator_receipt_report_status_present=1 policy_decision_predecessor_signed_request_status_present=1 operator_receipt_report_predecessor_policy_decision_status_present=1 receipt_mode=report-only receipt_status=denied-report-only source_policy_decision_present=1 source_request_freshness_present=1 source_signed_request_present=1 source_runtime_dry_run_present=1 source_denial_reason_present=1 policy_decision_state=report-only request_freshness_state=report-only signed_request_state=report-only runtime_dry_run_state=report-only default_action_deny=1 would_allow=0 would_deny=1 would_execute_tool=0 would_read_host=0 would_write_host=0 would_use_network=0 would_grant_runtime_authority=0 unknown_tool_denied=1 unsigned_request_denied=1 invalid_schema_denied=1 stale_request_denied=1 replayed_request_denied=1 invalid_signature_denied=1 receipt_complete=1 receipt_invalid=0 report_only=1 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 implementation_behavior_changed=0 runtime_behavior_added=0 host_behavior_added=0 network_behavior_added=0 ``` The Latticra Seal local capability registry schema report surface/status checkpoint renders a deterministic local schema fixture and ties that report-only schema checkpoint to the guarded operator receipt report status predecessor while preserving no registry loader, no registry file reads, no registry file writes, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current local capability registry schema surface/status fields: ```text latticra_seal_local_capability_registry_schema_surface_present=1 latticra_seal_local_capability_registry_schema_status_present=1 seal_local_capability_registry_schema_implementation_present=1 seal_local_capability_registry_schema_surface_present=1 seal_local_capability_registry_schema_status_present=1 seal_operator_receipt_report_status_present=1 local_capability_registry_schema_predecessor_operator_receipt_report_status_present=1 registry_schema_profile=latticra-seal-local-capability-registry-schema/0.1 registry_scope=local-only registry_mode=report-only registry_status=contract-only registry_loader_implemented=0 registry_file_loading_supported=0 registry_network_loading_supported=0 registry_signature_verification_supported=0 registry_trust_store_supported=0 registry_entry_count=1 default_action_deny=1 capability_id=seal.local.registry.schema capability_scope=operator-review-boundary capability_effect_class=none capability_authority_class=descriptive-only capability_grants_authority=0 capability_executes_tool=0 capability_reads_host=0 capability_writes_host=0 capability_uses_network=0 capability_report_only=1 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 implementation_behavior_changed=0 runtime_behavior_added=0 host_behavior_added=0 network_behavior_added=0 ``` The Latticra Seal Panel dashboard planning checkpoint defines a future read-only operator dashboard that can show existing Seal evidence rows while preserving no Panel UI implementation, no dashboard view model implementation, no report file loading, no host scanning, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current Seal Panel dashboard planning fields: ```text latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_planning_checkpoint_present=1 latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_planning_status_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_planning_checkpoint_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_planning_status_present=1 panel_dashboard_predecessor_local_capability_registry_schema_status_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_profile=latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-planning/0.1 seal_panel_dashboard_mode=planning-only seal_panel_dashboard_status=not-implemented panel_visible_target=1 local_report_sources_planned=1 operator_receipt_report_source_planned=1 local_capability_registry_schema_source_planned=1 policy_decision_source_planned=1 runtime_dry_run_source_planned=1 verification_receipt_source_planned=1 capability_gate_source_planned=1 effect_decision_source_planned=1 panel_ui_implemented=0 dashboard_view_model_implemented=0 report_file_loading_implemented=0 panel_launch_performed=0 panel_workflow_run=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 production_security_product=0 implementation_behavior_changed=0 runtime_behavior_added=0 host_behavior_added=0 network_behavior_added=0 ``` The Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model contract defines future read-only dashboard rows for existing Seal evidence while preserving no Panel UI implementation, no dashboard view-model implementation, no report file loading, no host scanning, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no signature verification, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current Seal Panel dashboard view-model contract fields: ```text latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_contract_present=1 latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_contract_status_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_contract_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_contract_status_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_planning_status_present=1 panel_dashboard_view_model_predecessor_panel_dashboard_planning_status_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_profile=latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-view-model/0.1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_mode=contract-only seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_status=not-implemented view_model_rows_planned=1 view_model_row_contract_present=1 source_summary_contract_present=1 authority_absence_contract_present=1 operator_review_contract_present=1 receipt_link_contract_present=1 next_guarded_slice_contract_present=1 caller_provided_source_records_only=1 deterministic_fixture_allowed=1 report_file_loading_allowed=0 host_path_scanning_allowed=0 registry_loading_allowed=0 network_lookup_allowed=0 tool_execution_allowed=0 policy_enforcement_allowed=0 capability_enforcement_allowed=0 signature_verification_allowed=0 trust_store_lookup_allowed=0 runtime_handoff_allowed=0 panel_ui_implemented=0 dashboard_view_model_implemented=0 report_file_loading_implemented=0 host_path_scanning_implemented=0 registry_loader_implemented=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 production_security_product=0 ``` The Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation plan defines exact future C files, fixed-capacity types, deterministic fixture rows, validation rules, and report output while preserving no C implementation, no report loading, no host scanning, no Panel UI rendering, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no signature verification, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation plan fields: ```text latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_present=1 latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_status_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_status_present=1 panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_predecessor_contract_status_present=1 planned_header=include/latticra/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model.h planned_source=src/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model.c planned_invariants_test=tests/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_invariants.c planned_surface_test=tests/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_surface.c view_model_rows_max=16 default_fixture_rows=12 default_decision=deny missing_source_default_decision=review malformed_source_default_decision=deny stale_source_default_decision=deny unknown_source_default_decision=deny all_rows_authority_absent=1 all_rows_can_execute_tool=0 all_rows_can_read_host=0 all_rows_can_write_host=0 all_rows_can_use_network=0 all_rows_grant_runtime_authority=0 all_rows_effect_performed=0 implementation_created=0 header_created=0 source_created=0 test_created=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model surface renders the deterministic local report from caller-provided report strings while preserving no Panel UI rendering, no report file loading, no host scanning, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no signature verification, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current Seal Panel dashboard view-model surface fields: ```text latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_surface_present=1 latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_status_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_surface_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_status_present=1 panel_dashboard_view_model_predecessor_implementation_plan_status_present=1 operator_visible_panel_dashboard_view_model=1 uses_local_deterministic_fixture=1 surface_runner=scripts/latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-view-model.sh surface_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-view-model-surface.sh status_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-view-model-status.sh surface_fixture=tests/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_surface.c seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_profile=latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-view-model/0.1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_mode=report-only seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_status=planned-no-effect view_model_entry_count=12 view_model_source_count=12 caller_provided_report_strings_only=1 missing_source_row_visible=1 malformed_source_row_visible=1 stale_source_row_visible=1 panel_ui_implemented=0 dashboard_view_model_implemented=1 report_file_loading_implemented=0 auto_discover_reports=0 auto_scan_host_paths=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path contract defines a future verification-only evidence chain from receipt metadata through signature request and verification receipt metadata while preserving no signing, no signature verification, no trust-root loading, no revocation lookup, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production proof claim. Current Seal signed receipt proof path contract fields: ```text latticra_seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_contract_present=1 latticra_seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_contract_status_present=1 seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_contract_present=1 seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_contract_status_present=1 signed_receipt_proof_path_predecessor_panel_dashboard_view_model_status_present=1 contract_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path-contract.sh status_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path-contract-status.sh signed_receipt_proof_path_profile=latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path/0.1 signed_receipt_proof_path_mode=contract-only signed_receipt_proof_path_status=not-implemented proof_path_scope=verification-only proof_path_authority=none verification_only_until_trust_root_and_revocation=1 required_source_operator_receipt_report=1 required_source_report_envelope=1 required_source_signature_request=1 required_source_verification_policy=1 required_source_verification_receipt=1 trust_root_required_for_promotion=1 revocation_boundary_required_for_promotion=1 crypto_backend_required_for_promotion=1 operator_review_required=1 signed_receipt_created=0 signature_created=0 signer_invoked=0 signature_verification_performed=0 cryptographic_verification_performed=0 verified_receipt_authority=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path implementation summarizes local verified receipt metadata and metadata-only signing-operation metadata into a verification-only proof path while preserving no production proof, no trust-root loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signer invocation, no key handling, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no effects, no host behavior, and no network behavior. Current Seal signed receipt proof path implementation fields: ```text latticra_seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_implementation_present=1 latticra_seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_status_present=1 seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_implementation_present=1 seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_status_present=1 signed_receipt_proof_path_predecessor_contract_status_present=1 implemented_header=include/latticra/seal_signed_receipt_proof_path.h implemented_source=src/seal_signed_receipt_proof_path.c implemented_invariants_test=tests/seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_invariants.c implementation_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path.sh status_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path-status.sh signed_receipt_proof_path_profile=latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path/0.1 signed_receipt_proof_path_mode=verification-only signed_receipt_proof_path_status=implemented-no-effect local_verify_result_present=1 receipt_promotion_present=1 signing_operation_present=1 receipt_verified=1 digest_matches=1 public_key_matches=1 trust_root_required=1 trust_root_verified=0 revocation_required=1 revocation_checked=0 verification_only=1 proof_path_verified=0 authority_usable=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 signature_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 handoff_performed=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path surface renders the deterministic local verification-only proof-path report while preserving no production proof, no trust-root loading, no revocation lookup, no signing, no signer invocation, no key handling, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no runtime authority, no effects, no host behavior, and no network behavior. Current Seal signed receipt proof path surface fields: ```text latticra_seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_surface_present=1 latticra_seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_surface_status_present=1 seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_surface_present=1 seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_surface_status_present=1 signed_receipt_proof_path_surface_predecessor_implementation_status_present=1 surface_fixture=tests/seal_signed_receipt_proof_path_surface.c surface_runner=scripts/latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path.sh surface_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path-surface.sh surface_status_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-signed-receipt-proof-path-surface-status.sh signed_receipt_proof_path_mode=verification-only uses_local_deterministic_fixture=1 fixture_receipt_promotion_present=1 fixture_signing_operation_present=1 proof_path_state=verification-only digest_matches=1 public_key_matches=1 trust_root_required=1 trust_root_verified=0 revocation_required=1 revocation_checked=0 verification_only=1 proof_path_verified=0 authority_usable=0 capability_gate_allowed=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 signature_performed=0 signer_invoked=0 private_key_handling=0 key_generation_performed=0 trust_store_loaded=0 revocation_lookup_performed=0 handoff_performed=0 effect_performed=0 host_read_performed=0 host_write_performed=0 network_performed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation maps caller-provided report strings and source flags into fixed-capacity denied-by-default rows while preserving no Panel UI rendering, no report file loading, no host scanning, no policy enforcement, no capability enforcement, no signature verification, no runtime execution, no runtime authority, no effect execution, no host behavior, no network behavior, and no production enforcement claim. Current Seal Panel dashboard view-model implementation fields: ```text latticra_seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_present=1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_status_present=1 panel_dashboard_view_model_implementation_plan_predecessor_contract_status_present=1 implemented_header=include/latticra/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model.h implemented_source=src/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model.c implemented_invariants_test=tests/seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_invariants.c implementation_guard=scripts/test-latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-view-model.sh seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_profile=latticra-seal-panel-dashboard-view-model/0.1 seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_mode=report-only seal_panel_dashboard_view_model_status=planned-no-effect view_model_rows_max=16 default_fixture_rows=12 missing_source_row_visible=1 malformed_source_row_visible=1 stale_source_row_visible=1 missing_source_default_decision=review malformed_source_default_decision=deny stale_source_default_decision=deny unknown_source_default_decision=deny all_rows_authority_absent=1 all_rows_can_execute_tool=0 all_rows_can_read_host=0 all_rows_can_write_host=0 all_rows_can_use_network=0 all_rows_grant_runtime_authority=0 all_rows_effect_performed=0 panel_ui_implemented=0 dashboard_view_model_implemented=1 report_file_loading_implemented=0 host_path_scanning_implemented=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 effect_performed=0 ``` The Latticra Seal README status row alignment keeps the compact README Seal row and Seal current-posture summary aligned with the current public status checkpoint while preserving no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, no MCP behavior, no AI agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, no production enforcement, no public-readiness promotion, no security-hardening implementation, and no runtime authority. Alignment record: ```text docs/status/SEAL_README_STATUS_ROW_ALIGNMENT.md seal_readme_status_row_alignment_present=1 ``` The defensive threat model validation refinement records the current evidence-mapping, external-source checkpoint, manual-review requirement, and next-gap triage while preserving no security controls, no runtime execution, no effect execution, no capability enforcement, no cryptographic verification, no signing, no host behavior, no network behavior, no MCP behavior, no AI agent execution, no model execution, no tool execution, no shell execution, no production protection claim, and no runtime authority. The project notes are now aligned across current direction, upcoming work, and project-notes index surfaces. The current status and announcement consistency review confirms the public status and announcement surfaces now point to the same next review lane. The completion percentage review conservatively updates planning estimates after the recent report, diagnostic, audit, README, foundation-index, project-notes, and status-consistency slices. The completion estimate review after runtime-boundary abuse-case fixtures keeps the runtime-boundary fixture-slice estimate decision unchanged because the latest fixture slice improves denied-case evidence without changing capability posture, implementation behavior, public readiness, security hardening, product readiness, or runtime authority. The completion estimate review README/status alignment makes the latest hold review visible from README and status entry points without changing capability posture, implementation behavior, public readiness, security hardening, product readiness, completion estimates, or runtime authority. Current estimate table source alignment records that the rough completion estimate table below is the live reader-facing estimate source. The current estimate mathematical rebase records the live table as a weighted planning estimate after recent guarded Seal signed-receipt proof-path, Panel signed-updater denial/disposition, OS image artifact manifest, platform boot/firmware integrity, supply-chain guard, installer UI sanitization, public documentation, strategy, and public-entry alignment work. Dated review records remain slice-specific evidence records and may preserve the estimate snapshot that applied when that review was written. The macOS integration transferability status summary now surfaces the top-level transferability map, dedicated guard, and pull-request workflow for adapting current no-effect, receipt-first, user-local Latticra surfaces into a future macOS lane without claiming app-bundle creation, install verification, host mutation, runtime authority, launchd behavior, Keychain behavior, Secure Enclave behavior, notarization, or production readiness. The macOS codesigning and notarization plan now records the future signing-identity, entitlements, notarization submission, stapling, and review prerequisites while preserving zero signing, zero Apple account access, zero network use, zero host mutation, and zero runtime authority. The macOS reset/uninstall status summary now surfaces the newer live-runner closeout audit chain through the disposition closeout audit review contract while preserving stdout-only evidence, closed acceptance gates, blocked dispatch, disabled deletion, no host mutation, no network activity, and no runtime authority. Alignment records: ```text docs/status/CURRENT_ESTIMATE_TABLE_SOURCE_ALIGNMENT.md docs/status/CURRENT_ESTIMATE_MATHEMATICAL_REBASE_2026_05_28.md current_estimate_table_source_alignment_present=1 current_estimate_mathematical_rebase_present=1 source_alignment_estimate_changed=0 mathematical_rebase_estimate_changed=1 estimate_adjustment_required=0 docs/status/COMPLETION_ESTIMATE_REVIEW_README_STATUS_ALIGNMENT.md ``` The strategy estimate review records the current planning estimate posture in the strategy layer while preserving the original dated strategy record as historical context. ## Direction checkpoint ```text C is the metal. C++ is the disciplined structure. Latticra is the contract. ``` The C/C++ foundation direction is guarded as an active language strategy. It means C owns the secure substrate, constrained C++ owns governed policy/validator/effect-gate/audit layers, and Lat / Latticra Language remains the contract/declaration layer. ## Rough completion estimates These percentages are planning estimates only. | Area | Estimated completion | | --- | ---: | | Overall Latticra system | 48% | | Latticra Seal / local evidence layer | 45% | | Latticra Panel / local control surface | 37% | | Nadia offline AI foundation | 77% | | L-UI parser / AST / string foundation | 87% | | Foundation documents and contracts | 96% | | Public documentation posture | 94% | | Strategy/status/funding framework | 67% | | Lat / Latticra Programming Language | 27% | | LIR / Intermediate Representation | 24% | | C/C++ foundation direction | 25% | | Constrained C++ authority layer | 5% | | Nucleus real task execution | 14% | | Runtime / operating-system-universe direction | 32% | | Security-hardening implementation | 14% | | Public product readiness | 13% | These percentages are planning estimates only. They are not release promises, production-readiness metrics, security guarantees, Fedora approval claims, Debian archive claims, FreeBSD ports-tree claims, OpenBSD ports-tree claims, runtime-enforcement claims, or operating-system completeness claims. ## Current implemented evidence areas Implemented or guarded areas include: ```text state lattice fixture tri-plane transition preview model Nucleus preview request classification Nucleus task execution contract Nucleus task execution implementation plan Nucleus task execution implementation Nucleus task report refinement Nucleus task no-effect report alignment Nucleus task README/status alignment Nucleus task report-only execution refinement Nucleus task report-only execution README/status alignment Project notes Nucleus report-only alignment Project notes Nucleus report-only status/index check Nucleus report-only announcement review Nucleus report-only announcement README alignment Project notes Nucleus announcement README status/index check Runtime boundary contract Runtime boundary implementation plan Runtime boundary implementation Runtime boundary refinement plan Runtime boundary refinement implementation Runtime boundary report refinement Runtime boundary policy matrix refinement Runtime boundary domain matrix refinement Runtime boundary domain matrix report integration Runtime boundary Lat pipeline comment evidence integration Kernel lifecycle seed Kernel scheduler tick seed Kernel run queue seed Kernel context switch seed Kernel time accounting seed Kernel preemption seed Kernel scheduler credit seed Kernel scheduler selection seed Kernel scheduler dispatch seed Kernel scheduler handoff seed Kernel scheduler activation seed Kernel scheduler run-entry seed Kernel runtime entry admission seed Kernel runtime entry frame seed Kernel runtime entry register-view seed Kernel runtime entry stack-view seed Kernel runtime entry address-space-view seed Kernel runtime entry privilege-level-view seed Kernel runtime entry syscall-gate-view seed Kernel runtime entry syscall-dispatch-view seed Kernel runtime entry syscall-return-view seed Kernel runtime entry syscall-exit-view seed Kernel runtime entry user-mode-resume-view seed Kernel runtime entry post-resume-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry scheduler-return-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry process-return-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry idle-return-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry quiescent-return-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry persistence-boundary-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-boundary-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-plan-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-disposition-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-outcome-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-closeout-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-review-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-review-closeout-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-review-closeout-archive-gate-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-review-closeout-archive-gate-review-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-review-closeout-archive-gate-review-disposition-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-review-closeout-archive-gate-review-disposition-closeout-observation-view seed Kernel runtime entry recovery-audit-review-disposition-review-closeout-archive-gate-review-disposition-closeout-archive-gate-observation-view seed Kernel lifecycle report runner Kernel lifecycle subsystem summary Kernel lifecycle rollback plan Latticra Seal signing operation status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal signing operation metadata implementation Latticra Seal signing operation contract Latticra Seal README status row alignment Latticra Seal effect decision status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal effect decision predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal runtime handoff status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal status rollup status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal status rollup predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal agentic automation security public-entrypoint alignment Latticra Seal parameter schema status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal request freshness status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal signed request status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal Ed25519 verify-only status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal capability gate status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal verification receipt status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal verification receipt predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal crypto verify backend status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal Ed25519 verify-only status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal verified receipt promotion status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal runtime handoff report status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal verification policy status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal verification policy predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal key parsing status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal bounded no-effect key parsing implementation Latticra Seal key parsing predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal future key parsing implementation plan Latticra Seal future key parsing implementation contract Latticra Seal public-key parsing predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal key-material predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal key-handling predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal signing operation predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal signer invocation predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal signer invocation status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal signer invocation metadata implementation Latticra Seal signer invocation contract Latticra Seal signer handoff predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal signer handoff status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal signer handoff metadata implementation Latticra Seal signer handoff contract Latticra Seal signing authorization predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal signing authorization status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal signing authorization metadata implementation Latticra Seal signing authorization contract Latticra Seal signature request predecessor status alignment Latticra Seal signature request status/public-entry alignment Latticra Seal signature request metadata implementation Latticra Seal signature request contract Latticra Seal report envelope metadata implementation Defensive threat model contract Defensive threat model validation refinement Runtime boundary policy expansion after threat-model validation Runtime boundary abuse-case fixture expansion after policy expansion Completion estimate review README/status alignment L-UI parser implementation semantic validation contract semantic validation implementation plan semantic validation implementation Lat semantic diagnostics refinement Lat grammar report metadata integration Lat grammar line-comment metadata refinement Lat grammar unsupported block-comment rejection refinement Lat pipeline comment metadata integration Lat pipeline diagnostic comment metadata integration Runtime boundary Lat pipeline comment evidence integration Lat model normalization implementation Lat model report declaration metadata integration Lat model report clause metadata integration LIR shape contract LIR shape implementation plan LIR shape implementation LIR report refinement Lat language grammar contract Lat language grammar implementation plan Lat language grammar implementation Lat semantic validation foundation Lat-to-LIR lowering contract Lat-to-LIR lowering implementation plan Lat-to-LIR lowering implementation Lat pipeline contract Lat pipeline implementation plan Lat pipeline implementation Lat pipeline model normalization integration Lat-to-LIR model lowering integration Lat-to-LIR declaration metadata refinement Lat-to-LIR diagnostic declaration metadata integration Lat-to-LIR diagnostic refinement Lat pipeline lowering diagnostic integration Lat-to-LIR clause metadata refinement Lat-to-LIR diagnostic clause metadata integration Lat pipeline diagnostic declaration metadata integration Lat pipeline diagnostic clause metadata integration Lat pipeline report declaration metadata integration Lat pipeline report clause metadata integration Lat pipeline report refinement Lat pipeline diagnostic integration refinement Lat pipeline diagnostic integration main test audit Lat-specific LIR refinement contract Lat-specific LIR refinement implementation plan Lat-specific LIR refinement implementation language representation review C/C++ foundation direction Constrained C++ authority layer contract Constrained C++ authority layer implementation plan Constrained C++ authority layer implementation C++ authority expansion contract review authority implementation review authority status/docs alignment authority announcement review authority foundation index alignment current status detail rollup public entry-point consistency scan project notes follow-up alignment project notes follow-up status/index check L-UI rendering contract L-UI rendering implementation plan L-UI rendering implementation L-UI rendering detailed report refinement L-UI rendering README/status alignment L-UI completion estimate review project notes current-direction alignment project notes upcoming-work alignment project notes index alignment status announcement review status and announcement consistency review completion percentage review strategy estimate review security policy public legacy association guard strategy index status index funding metadata ``` ## Current non-claims Latticra does not currently provide: - a kernel; - a bootable image; - a production or daily-driver installer; - a production language runtime; - effect-performing runtime behavior; - command execution; - unrestricted C++ authority; - effect-performing implemented C++ authority layer; - effect-performing Nucleus task execution; - interactive L-UI rendering; - terminal-control L-UI rendering; - LIR execution; - Lat execution; - Lat compiler; - Lat interpreter; - live movement; - operating-system replacement. ## Current mission alignment Latticra is being built toward a defensive, auditable, open systems architecture. The long-term goal is to make unsafe behavior harder to hide and easier to inspect through contract-driven source handling, explicit effects, deterministic diagnostics, operator-visible state, constrained substrate behavior, governed authority layers, deterministic rendering surfaces, denied-by-default task boundaries, Nucleus task report refinement, Nucleus task no-effect report alignment, Nucleus task report-only execution refinement, explicit runtime boundaries, runtime boundary domain matrix refinement, runtime boundary domain matrix report integration, Lat semantic validation, Lat semantic diagnostics refinement, Lat grammar report metadata integration, Lat grammar line-comment metadata refinement, Lat grammar unsupported block-comment rejection refinement, Lat model normalization, Lat model report declaration metadata integration, Lat model report clause metadata integration, Lat-to-LIR declaration metadata refinement, Lat-to-LIR metadata lowering, Lat-to-LIR diagnostic refinement, Lat-to-LIR diagnostic declaration metadata integration, LIR report refinement, Lat pipeline reporting, Lat pipeline lowering diagnostic integration, Lat pipeline diagnostic declaration metadata integration, Lat pipeline diagnostic clause metadata integration, Lat pipeline report declaration metadata integration, Lat pipeline report clause metadata integration, Lat pipeline comment metadata integration, Lat pipeline diagnostic comment metadata integration, Lat parse-failure comment evidence propagation, Lat pipeline failure span evidence propagation, Lat pipeline parse-error evidence propagation, Lat pipeline semantic-error evidence propagation, Lat pipeline downstream stage-error evidence propagation, Lat pipeline stage-summary evidence propagation, Lat pipeline module/count evidence propagation, Lat pipeline first-declaration evidence propagation, Lat pipeline first-clause evidence propagation, Lat LIR edge-kind evidence propagation, Lat LIR no-effect evidence propagation, Lat LIR module-summary evidence propagation, Lat LIR module label evidence propagation, Lat LIR source-span evidence propagation, Lat LIR node-kind evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-node evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-node topology evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-node span evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-node evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-node topology evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-node span evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-edge evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-edge endpoint evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-edge endpoint payload evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-edge endpoint topology evidence propagation, Lat LIR first-edge span evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-source edge evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint payload evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint topology evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint span evidence propagation, Lat LIR first transition-source edge span evidence propagation, Runtime boundary Lat pipeline comment evidence integration, Lat pipeline report refinement, Lat pipeline diagnostic integration refinement, Lat pipeline diagnostic main test audit, Lat-specific LIR refinement, runtime boundary evidence reporting, runtime boundary report refinement, and runtime boundary policy matrix refinement. This is a mission direction, not a current security guarantee. ## Latest completed contract slice Latest completed contract slice: ```text Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path contract ``` ## Latest completed status/public-entry slice Latest completed status/public-entry slice: ```text Latticra Seal signed receipt proof path contract/status ``` ## Previous status/public-entry slice Previous status/public-entry slice: ```text Latticra Seal Panel dashboard view-model surface/status ``` ## Earlier status/public-entry slice Earlier status/public-entry slice: ```text Latticra Seal parameter schema predecessor status alignment ``` ## Latest completed implementation slice Latest completed implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first-edge endpoint topology evidence propagation ``` ## Previous implementation slice Previous implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first-edge endpoint payload evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first-edge endpoint evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint topology evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR module label evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint payload evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint span evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-source edge endpoint evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-node span evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-node evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-source edge span evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first transition-source edge evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first-edge span evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first-edge evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first-node span evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR first-node evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR node-kind evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR source-span evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR module-summary evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR no-effect evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat LIR edge-kind evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline first-clause evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline first-declaration evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline module/count evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline stage-summary evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline downstream stage-error evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline semantic-error evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline parse-error evidence propagation ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Lat pipeline failure span evidence propagation ``` ## Previous contract slice Previous contract slice: ```text Latticra Seal public-key parsing boundary contract ``` ## Earlier status/public-entry slice Earlier status/public-entry slice: ```text Latticra Seal key-material status/public-entry alignment ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Latticra Seal key-handling metadata implementation ``` ## Earlier contract slice Earlier contract slice: ```text Latticra Seal key-handling boundary contract ``` ## Earlier status/public-entry slice Earlier status/public-entry slice: ```text Latticra Seal signing operation status/public-entry alignment ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Latticra Seal signing operation metadata implementation ``` ## Latest completed planning slice Latest completed planning slice: ```text Latticra Seal future key parsing implementation plan ``` ## Previous planning slice Previous planning slice: ```text Runtime boundary refinement plan ``` ## Earlier completed status/public-entry slice Earlier completed status/public-entry slice: ```text Latticra Seal signer invocation status/public-entry alignment ``` ## Earlier implementation slice Earlier implementation slice: ```text Latticra Seal signer invocation metadata implementation ``` ## Older implementation slice Older implementation slice: ```text Latticra Seal signer handoff metadata implementation ``` ## Next recommended work Latest completed review slice: ```text Completion estimate review README/status alignment ``` Current completion estimate review fields: ```text current_estimate_table_source_alignment_present=1 current_estimate_mathematical_rebase_present=1 completion_estimate_review_readme_status_alignment_present=1 completion_estimate_after_runtime_boundary_abuse_case_fixtures_present=1 source_alignment_estimate_changed=0 mathematical_rebase_estimate_changed=1 runtime_boundary_abuse_case_fixture_expansion_present=1 runtime_boundary_abuse_case_fixture_count=8 source_alignment_estimate_changed=0 runtime_execution_added=0 effect_execution_added=0 capability_enforcement_added=0 security_hardening_changed=0 public_readiness_changed=0 estimate_adjustment_required=0 runtime_authority_granted=0 completion_estimate_review_required=0 ``` Recommended next work: ```text Keep v0.3.0edge effect posture aligned while bounded local effects remain separated from root, network, USB, QEMU, package-manager, kernel, service, boot, and production-readiness authority. ``` Completion estimate review should now treat bounded local effects as a capability-posture change, but it must not turn local effect visibility into a production-readiness claim. The effect-substrate transition intake now records that future effect-runner, build-profile, and Model-1 bridge work must land through an effect contract schema, evidence record contract, allowlist boundary, build-profile boundary, Model-1 bridge contract, and Model-1 import/mixed-build review boundary before any capability promotion. The effect contract schema and evidence record contract now satisfy the first transition-intake prerequisite while preserving denied effect execution, command execution, file mutation, Model-1 bridge execution, runtime authority, production-readiness, and distribution-readiness claims. The effect allowlist and build-profile boundary now satisfies the second transition-intake prerequisite and requires `operator_usable_workflow_required=1` before any effect-runner, build-profile, or Model-1 bridge promotion review. The effect runner implementation review boundary now satisfies the third transition-intake boundary by requiring runner request classification, allowlist decisions, build-profile decisions, operator-workflow references, and evidence-record fields while preserving denied runner dispatch, effect execution, command execution, file mutation, and runtime authority. The separate-build platform integration review boundary now satisfies the fourth transition-intake boundary by recording the observed `~/Latticra` branch, build layout, artifacts, build profiles, and Model-1 tree while preserving denied build execution, artifact import, artifact acceptance, mixed-build promotion, and Model-1 bridge execution. The Model-1 bridge protocol contract now satisfies the fifth transition-intake boundary by defining bridge message format, trace correlation, authority handoff, target evidence fields, and denial behavior while preserving denied Model-1 launch, bridge execution, effect dispatch, command execution, file mutation, and runtime authority. The Model-1 import and mixed-build review boundary now satisfies the sixth transition-intake boundary by requiring import scope, source provenance, mixed-build layout, target identity, bridge-protocol compatibility, target evidence, and non-claim evidence while preserving denied Model-1 import acceptance, mixed-build promotion, bridge execution, effect dispatch, command execution, file mutation, and runtime authority. The computational proof foundation now records Latticra's science and computer-science framing for simulation-bound reality research while requiring proof objects, falsifiability, observer boundaries, physics constraint models, receipts, replay, and adversarial review before any scientific claim is promoted. The computational math and physics evaluation now records the proof-lane order: math review first, physics coupling second, substrate-engine visual demonstration preparation third, with `visual_demo_rendered=0` and scientific claim promotion still closed. The Speculum premise now names the clarifying mirror beside the simulacrum, preserving simulation-bound reality language as a bounded research premise while denying reality-simulation proof, physics measurement, metaphysical claim promotion, runtime execution, effect execution, and public certainty performance. Proof Object 1 now records the guarded conditional theorem that particles need not be primitive and mass can be derived as a stable substrate excitation invariant. Proof Object 2 now records Higgs counterplay: Higgs is preserved as effective physics, while Latticra challenges Higgs as final cause through substrate impedance. Proof Object 3 now records the Higgs causal-closure no-go: a Higgs-only account maps undetermined couplings and a vacuum scale into masses but does not derive those quantities. Proof Object 4 now records the original Latticra mass-origin formalism: identity-replay impedance, where mass is the replay-stable cost for a projected localized identity to remain itself under substrate update. The identity-replay impedance candidate particle table now records measured PDG 2025 update mass-ratio targets for electron, muon, tau, W, Z, Higgs, and top candidate identity classes while keeping `ledger_computation_performed=0`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, `standard_model_replacement_claimed=0`, and `simulation_proven=0`. The identity-replay impedance toy substrate L0 mass-ratio runner now executes a deterministic falsifier harness, computes toy `Z_L` ratios, emits a receipt hash, compares against the target table, and records `candidate_survives_target_table=0` while preserving `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`. The identity-replay impedance L1 constrained substrate search now executes deterministic target-guided search over a small integer-weight identity-feature impedance family, emits a receipt hash, reports `overfit_risk_flag=1`, performs leave-one-out review, and keeps `candidate_survives_target_table=0`, `candidate_survives_leave_one_out=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay impedance L2 pre-registration gate now locks a candidate law receipt and external blinded-holdout protocol while keeping `blinded_holdout_oracle_present=0`, `holdout_evaluation_performed=0`, `candidate_promoted=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay impedance L3 external blinded-holdout intake now binds to the L2 pre-registration receipt, defines the external oracle schema, and records `external_blinded_holdout_oracle_received=0`, `holdout_execution_ready=0`, `holdout_evaluation_performed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay impedance L4 blinded-holdout execution gate now binds to the L3 intake receipt and L2 pre-registration receipt, defines the prediction execution rule and acceptance boundary, and records `oracle_received=0`, `holdout_execution_ready=0`, `holdout_execution_performed=0`, `candidate_promoted=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay impedance L5 blinded-holdout oracle evidence-review gate now binds to the L4 execution receipt, rejects synthetic fixture evidence as external proof, and records `oracle_evidence_packet_received=0`, `evidence_review_performed=0`, `evidence_externality_review_passed=0`, `candidate_promoted=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-1 dynamic substrate runner now defines a finite local substrate, computes counterfactual repair-cost traces before loading measured targets, emits a prediction receipt, evaluates the receipt against the guarded target table only afterward, preserves photon/gluon zero-rest-mass controls, and records `candidate_survives_target_table=0`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-1 bounded range falsifier now proves a scoped negative conclusion: the first finite bounded-cell Model-1 substrate class cannot span the measured mass-ratio vector, because its generous electron-normalized replay-cost ratio bound is `1088` while the guarded target table reaches `337691.49623497269417`; it records `model1_bounded_substrate_class_falsified=1`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-2 hierarchical substrate pre-registration now locks a four-scale multiplicative replay law before target loading and then separately verifies dynamic-range capacity after the receipt exists. It records `hierarchical_max_ratio_bound_before_target_load=342102016`, `target_ratio_within_model2_hierarchical_capacity=1`, `model2_not_falsified_by_range_bound=1`, `mass_ratio_predictions_emitted=0`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-2 prediction runner now emits hierarchical replay predictions before target loading, validates the receipt before evaluation, and rejects the first deterministic prediction law against the guarded target table. It records `prediction_dynamic_range=22.098461538461538461538461538461538461538461538461538461538461538461538461538462`, `target_dynamic_range=337691.49623497269417`, `candidate_survives_target_table=0`, `model2_prediction_law_rejected=1`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-2 prediction failure analysis now records why Model-2 failed: dynamic range is short by `15281.221982228644612259816207184628237259816207184628237259816207184628237259816`, the predicted identity ordering is wrong, the lepton family is inverted, and heavy-sector replay cost is compressed. It records `required_model3_property=target_blind_topological_replay_amplification`, `model3_prediction_runner_authorized=0`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-3 worthiness gate now authorizes only pre-registration of a target-blind topological amplification law. It records `model3_preregistration_authorized=1`, `model3_prediction_runner_authorized=0`, `model3_gate_conclusion=worth_preregistering_only_not_worth_promoting`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-3 topological amplification pre-registration now locks a target-blind branch/coalescence amplification law before target loading and then separately verifies dynamic-range capacity after the receipt exists. It records `model3_topological_max_ratio_bound_before_target_load=181807037485056`, `target_ratio_within_model3_topological_capacity=1`, `model3_prediction_runner_authorized_after_capacity_gate=1`, `mass_ratio_predictions_emitted=0`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-3 prediction runner now emits topological amplification predictions before target loading, validates the receipt before evaluation, and rejects the first deterministic Model-3 prediction law against the guarded target table. It records `prediction_dynamic_range=61685.116071428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571428571427`, `target_dynamic_range=337691.49623497269417`, `candidate_survives_target_table=0`, `model3_prediction_law_rejected=1`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-3 rejection analysis now records why the first topological amplification law failed: the dynamic range is still short by `5.4744404767584652275663280083338001338306169886721631882430541171586743908036395`, the predicted identity order is wrong, Higgs and Z fall below electron-scale impedance, and a single global amplifier is insufficient. It records `required_refined_model3_property=target_blind_sector_resolved_topological_charge_with_family_monotonicity`, `refined_model3_preregistration_authorized=1`, `refined_model3_prediction_runner_authorized=0`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay Model-3 failure visual suite now renders static SVG charts from the receipted Model-3 prediction, evaluation, and rejection-analysis path. It records `ordering_mismatch_visualized=1`, `sector_placement_failure_visualized=1`, `model3_prediction_law_rejected=1`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The identity-replay refined Model-3 pre-registration now locks the sector-resolved topological charge law shape before refined target loading or prediction. It records `target_table_loaded=0`, `target_comparison_performed=0`, `mass_ratio_predictions_emitted=0`, `refined_model3_capacity_gate_required_before_prediction=1`, `refined_model3_prediction_runner_authorized=0`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, and `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`. The Higgs challenge one-page verifier now gives outsiders a concise public entrypoint plus `make verify-higgs-chain`, a single command that runs the guarded Proof Object 2/3/4 through Model-3 rejection analysis and refined pre-registration. It records `single_command_reproduction_present=1`, `current_best_failure=Model-3 rejection analysis`, `refined_model3_preregistration_present=1`, `mass_ratio_recovery_claimed=0`, `higgs_checkmate_claimed=0`, and `simulation_proven=0`. Completed follow-on lane: Model-1 import and mixed-build review boundary. ```text Guarded Model-1 effect demonstration evidence boundary. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance candidate particle table. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance toy substrate L0 mass-ratio runner. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance L1 constrained substrate search. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance L2 pre-registered substrate law with blinded holdout. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance L3 external blinded-holdout intake. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance L4 blinded-holdout execution gate. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance L5 blinded-holdout oracle evidence review. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-1 dynamic substrate runner. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-1 substrate-law refinement gate. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-1 bounded range falsifier. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-2 hierarchical substrate pre-registration. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-2 prediction-only hierarchical replay runner. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-2 prediction failure analysis and law refinement. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-3 target-blind topological amplification pre-registration. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-3 prediction-only topological amplification runner. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-3 rejection analysis and amplification-law refinement. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance Model-3 failure visual suite. ``` Completed computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance refined Model-3 sector-resolved topological charge pre-registration. ``` Parallel computational-proof follow-up: ```text Identity-replay impedance refined Model-3 target-blind capacity gate. ``` Follow-on proof lanes: ```text Computational proof object schema contract. Measured Latticra candidate L0 specification. Measured Latticra electroweak-substrate candidate L0 specification. Latticra substrate impedance mass-ratio derivation. ``` After that: ```text Runtime behavior expansion only after separate contract, plan, tests, and explicit non-claim review ``` ## Update rule Update this file when major milestones merge, especially when completion estimates or next priorities change.